this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2025
172 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22131 readers
3807 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

President Trump is planning to invoke a wartime law known as the Alien Enemies Act of 1798 as soon as Friday to authorize the summary deportation of some migrants, including to Guantanamo Bay, escalating his government-wide immigration crackdown, multiple U.S. officials familiar with the plan told CBS News.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 week ago (1 children)

America: Thanks to trump, it’s now the greatest shithole on earth.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 week ago

Hey now, neoliberalis happily paved the way.

Ie: that removed Schumer

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So, not that it matters anymore, since this is now a dictatorship, but that law is only applicable during a declared war. I wonder who Congress declared war on?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Trump has been talking about making Canada the 51st state, annexing Greenland, going to war with Mexican cartels, and is actively telling the military to start making a plan for taking the Panama canal by force. He clearly doesn't give a shit about who is allowed to formally declare war, he's pushing to make this happen regardless.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

~~Dubya Bush~~ Trump: "I am the decider and I decide what is best."

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

According to the Brennan Center for Justice, the President can invoke the act without a war declaration if a foreign government threatens or attempts an “invasion” or “predatory incursion” against US territory. Invasion in that context has historically been defined as large-scale attacks, while “predatory incursion” has been defined as small skirmishes. And it’s the latter that Trump is hinging his argument on by declaring that the gang he’s claiming to target is working on the orders of the Venezuelan government.

https://www.brennancenter.org/our-work/research-reports/alien-enemies-act-explained

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Ourselves obviously

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I'm sorry your foresight worked :(

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Got any better predictions for us?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

You don't want to know what happens.

Just...run. Far away.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

In regards to the same topic, but from a different perspective

https://lemmy.ca/post/37223906/13925749

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well… I guess now we know when he’s planning to declare war.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Largely on half the country first.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I think the saying is, that Hitler declared war on Germany before the world.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

The enemy within, enemy of the people, radical left vermin, elon's posting about the woke mind virus, and all that.

Stand back and stand by.

Purge commencing in 5..4..3..2...

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Brown people?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

I thought there were no new wars under Trump?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Hey did everyone know that Russian soldiers rape other Russian soldiers of lowest rank/caste? That's male on male rape but according to Putin Russians aren't allowed to be gay, so in my opinion that's even more fucked up.

Here is some info about the men, women and children (as young as 4 years old) Russians have raped and murdered in Ukraine. Its a Wikipedia article which goes into a little more about the other barbarity and degradation of Russian soldiers, including castration. So I guess its not so surprising at all that they're raping their own soldiers.

That's why I don't like Russians here pushing their propaganda and pretending to have a sense of humanity while defending their country's inhuman actions.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sexual_violence_in_the_Russian_invasion_of_Ukraine

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It’s also irrelevant here.

Dedovshchina happens in most post-Soviet states.

It is practiced by Ukrainians in Ukraine.

Also practiced by Azerbaijanis in Azerbaijan.

Practiced by Armenians in Armenia.

Turkmenistan had to formally declare the practice of Dedovshchina illegal in 2014.

It is a problem that originated from a total fuck up regarding conscription laws way back in Soviet times.

It is also being healed and becoming less common in many post-Soviet states including Russia (especially due to 2008 reforms) and Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You heard it from the source folks. Male on male rape by Russian soldiers is irrelevant. Given to you by our very own Russian.

I'd say that its very relevant to considering a black site existing where any manner of crimes could be committed against human beings and noone could intervene - they wouldn't know. I'd assume that evil acts would be committed there.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Unless you can tell me how anal rape is at all related to Trump thinking of invoking (and has now invoked) wartime Alien Enemies Act of 1798 to carry out deportations to Guantanamo, then yes it is irrelevant.

It also does not only happen in post-Soviet states

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's relevant to you since that's your countrymen raping men in such an organised way. I think all of us here would like to know how the Russian people feel about that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

As opposed to up to 60,000 of your (assuming your American) troops being penetratively raped per year? That seems to be organized as well.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, since we're inventing things, a trillion Russian soldiers raped the soldiers of lowest rank.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nope it is not invented.

But comes from the American Psychological Association stating that rates of military sexual trauma among men who served in the military may be as much as 15 times higher than has been previously reported and this number being applied to Pentagon’s reported numbers of 12,000 male victims with 3,850 reported “penetrative” attacks which means if you increase this 15x as per study, you get up to 180,000 men being assaulted in one year and, of those, 57,750 are “penetrative” attacks.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nothing particularly unusual when it comes to this war.

How about a Ukrainian part of 113th brigade of the Ukrainian territorial defense confessing that he faced sexual harassment by his commander, who satisfied his sexual desires with the help of subordinates?

How about abuses conducted by Ukraine’s 211th Pontoon Bridge Brigade on their own troops as per even Ukrainian sources? Including Ukraine crucifying their own troops?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You don't want to read the article I linked to? Is there something disturbing about it?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

I read it.

Russian troops being beaten with sticks, made to dig holes, tied to trees, etc.

I literally just linked Ukrainians doing similar shit to their own troops.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Raped and forced to rape their own soldiers. Don't forget that part.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Similar to how commander of 113th brigade of the Ukrainian territorial defense threatened his subordinates with firearms to get them to satisfy his sexual desires.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yes I heard he ordered that the whole Ukrainian military be issued with Viagra when ordered to invade another country. Whoops, I remembered wrong. It was putin who did that.

Do you think the Viagra was given so that Russian soldiers can rape each other, or was it so that they could rape Ukrainian women? Or maybe Ukrainian children or men? Or should we just assume all of the above?

I mean, if you were Putin, why would you issue Viagra to men going into another country to invade?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

You fell for a literal fabrication.

This nonsense was also being pushed in 2011 Libya.

LOL

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't read tankie rags and as that's all you have, you're lying.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Nope even the UN Envoy that stated the viagra nonsense backtracked when confronted and stated this:

“No, no, no. And I don’t — like I said, it’s not my role to go and investigate. I sit in New York, in an office in New York, and I have an advocacy — and I have an advocacy mandate. My role is not to investigate.”

I also don’t support tanks rolling down Hungarian roads in 1956.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

It is. Especially when she continued and stated this:

“In their reports so far, there’s nothing about Viagra.”

The United Nations Office of the High Commissioner for Human Rights (OHCHR) indeed made zero reference to Viagra in its reports on Russo-Ukrainian conflict.

Again this nonsense dates back to 2011 Libya.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Wasn't it the phone conversation between the Russian soldier and his wife which was intercepted? The same one where the wife told her husband to rape the Ukrainian women, she encouraged him, but told him to use a condom and not to forget the viagra. Such a good wife. I guess she already knew his dick didn't work and he'd need the Viagra so he wouldn't be sent to the rape battalion. Maybe she packed the viagra for him and not Putin?

Question : do Russians have to drink vodka? Is sobriety one of the crimes for which the punishment is rape, for a man? So then the Viagra is necessary and the state provides?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

A rather terrible scandal, albeit viagra wasn’t at all mentioned in the intercepted conversation.