this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
49 points (100.0% liked)

Aotearoa / New Zealand

1781 readers
48 users here now

Kia ora and welcome to !newzealand, a place to share and discuss anything about Aotearoa in general

Rules:

FAQ ~ NZ Community List ~ Join Matrix chatroom

 

Banner image by Bernard Spragg

Got an idea for next month's banner?

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't think it's surprising, but good research to have backing this up nonetheless. Pretty much every problem in this country can be traced back to the lack of affordable and stable housing. It makes complete sense to me that a state house with security of tenure comes out better than a private rental you know you have for a year at most (and likely less if no cause evictions come back).

Incidentally, the authors of this study have done a lot of research into housing quality too. They found that providing insulation grants for our notoriously cold and damp houses generated savings many times the cost due to less pressure on the health system and fewer sick days from school and work.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 years ago

Yeah, such as shame that most of the NZ population seems to be so hostile to these kinds of policies. They work, and make life better for everyone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

If the zoning wasn't regulated to benefit existing owners then apartments would be built, plus new townhouses, and these damp decaying places would be $100 a week. If there was an actual housing/rental market (you know, one with real competition, instead of a market that's propped up by government policy) that could work, but I'm not against insulation requirements. If they sent jackboot thugs to inspect homes and threatened to shut them down if landlords didn't comply, I'd fully support it.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's amazing that people find this surprising at all, who'd have thought having a stable roof over your head would make you happier?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

Also, state housing normally means they have the house to themselves. I'm not in a state house or owning, I'm stuck in a crowded boarding house with 10 other people. The group that I'm in always has the lowest satisfaction, I'll bet. Everyone is complaining about each other constantly, that's also how we make friends, by bitching constantly about "the indians" who never stop talking loudly, and complaining about the Chinese landlord ripping us off. I'd rather have a stable house that I don't share with others, like an apartment. NZ lives in the past. Can't believe we don't have apartments in the suburbs of christchurch yet..........

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Housing co-ops, too. There are solutions that don't require us to drag capitalists out into the street and shoot them!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

But that's the fun part...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

You're not wrong, but having housing is also fun. Easier to take a day off work to go guillotine billionaires when you're not giving all your money to those same billionaires.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I seriously think that if we want any hope of getting out of the mess we currently are in we need stronger local communities - co-housing could be a very real way to enable that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

Starting locally is the only thing that works imo.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

If anyone wants to put money toward buying a plot of land, and filling it up with tiny houses - with a giant community farm - I'm down!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

The question really is, will our degenerate government comprised almost entirely of landlords do anything about it?