this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2025
370 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68187 readers
3551 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 121 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Several years back now, one of my colleagues was very much into the genealogy thing. She had major problems I think with needing to find herself or where she fit in or whatever. She was very much pushing me to try one of the DNA genealogy testing services and I had to be very firm about not wanting to participate in it.

This is why. My sense of self has never been in question and I don't need to attribute who or what I am to some people I've never met or culture I haven't participated in or been a part of. I have been considered "other" my whole life by in groups who only wanted me to identify with the bits and pieces of my culture or personality that they approved of and I pretty much had to get over that at a young age in order to not feel inadequate or content with myself.

As a result these always seemed like services that over promise and under deliver and they ask for way more privileged information than I am comfortable with giving away to anyone (I was skeptical when my doctor wanted me to participate in cancer screening via DNA testing because the only angle I could see for wanting it that would be profitable to an insurance firm was to deny me coverage later). Every time something hits the media about a leak or mismanagement of customer data, I am vindicated in my belief that it's not worth the price of admission.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Whenever someone mentioned these services to me, I would respond that I didn't trust them, and was often called paranoid. Maybe I just don't trust large companies with my most private data, and I don't know why others would.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 week ago (2 children)

The usual retort I heard is because someone in your extended family probably did take a DNA test at some point they "practically already have yours." At least that's what redditors parroted all the time.

I don't know if it is true, because I thought being a couple steps removed from your parents already renders most hereditary DNA unrelated. But I'm just a layman.

Regardless, it still wouldn't have been my choice to deliberately self own like that. Just turns me into an unwilling victim instead, much better /s.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago

Exactly half of your nuclear DNA is from your mom and half is from your dad. It's the same for them with their parents. It goes on and on like that. There's a really interesting technique called The Leeds Method that allows you to cluster your DNA matches and it basically groups your DNA matches into four main groups, one for each of your grandparents. So you can actually quite clearly, with a bit of family knowledge or research, see more or less how you're related to a DNA match by comparing who your common matches are.

It's hard to explain, but you can learn a lot about DNA matches who aren't your immediate family.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

not only that, but the test isnt going to be useful to a person whos not a geneticist anyways.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It doesn’t even matter anymore if you have participated or not. If any of your family members have, they can correlate the DNA they have with written genealogy records and basically determine your race, ancestry, defects, etc.

So when the Nazis in power really want to purge for purity, they already have whatever list they need.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

I don't think giving them more information to use against you. Is a good thing. Think about it this way, even if the police have you on camera in an area where a crime is committed, that doesn't mean you can't still plead the fifth and request a lawyer (assuming you're in the US). You aren't required to further their investigation.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago

I also don’t trust these. There is very little regulation and protection. Case in point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

a layperson isnt going to find much use of inaccurate results of potential "genetic diseases" a geneticist will do that. so it

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago

The people with access to their private data includes 23 and everyone else.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago

Thank you for sharing.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Who does ancestry.com get to run their sequencing? Because I have a number of relatives who did that. I don’t think it’s 23andme.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Everyone gets to run sequencing, but this post is about 23andme nearing bankruptcy, where they would run an auction for their records, including this genetic information of its customers.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah; my point is: if 23andme is liquidating, other genetic labs likely aren’t too far behind, and I’d like some warning there too… especially since I have to convince other people to delete their data.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Not how or works, 23andMe uses Labcorp.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Well I'm glad I downloaded all my genome data and deleted it a few months ago. It was easy to do, there's no excuse not to.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It’s cute you think that it’s actually deleted

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes, it's not worth them fucking around with various pii / gdpr fines. As someone who has worked with pii, we always took deletion requests seriously.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But like... deleting the data would lessen the sale price. Much easier to just delete your account and keep the data in an "anonymous" form. How are you (as the consumer) going to ever know if it's actually deleted?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

No lawyer / accountant is going to sign off on that. It would get flagged as fraud during due diligence and lower the price due to the risks of lawsuits and fines

[–] LiPoly 3 points 1 week ago

I’m sure there’s some legal text somewhere that states that deleting only refers to the association with your user account, but the actual genome data will still be kept “anonymized.” There’s just no way in hell that they’re actually deleting it all. Their lawyers are smarter than that.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

If you read the fine print, they keep your sample data for 2 years after deletion.

So maybe they actually delete your email address, but the DNA data itself is still definitely there.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I felt weird about it when my dad used this 23andMe service. He was very privacy-conscious, so it was uncharacteristic for him. Now he's dead. I wonder if there's still any way to get it deleted.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

You can do your own dna testing at home now anyways

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (3 children)

You still have to send it somewhere, at home kits are just about collecting the sample not sequencing it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 week ago

Now imagine, the person you responded to, is allowed to vote.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They didn't say what they were testing for. You can do a binary do you have DNA or not test to see if you are in fact a robot or not. All you need is soap and alcohol.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Drinking soap makes my stomach upset and drinking alcohol makes me upset, that means I'm a human right?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

Any robot I can get drunk with is alright by me

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

This thread made me look into the idea of DIYing it, and one of the search results I found looks like it legitimately is about actually doing the sequencing yourself:

https://techcrunch.com/2016/03/30/citizen-scientists-you-can-now-diy-your-own-dna-analysis/

$800 in 2016 was steep enough, but at the $1600 it apparently costs today I'm not sure it's still within the realm of DIY, if it ever really was. I wonder if there are any cheaper competitors?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That allows visualization of PCRed product, which is a far cry from whole genome sequencing. You can visualize a target at a time with no sequence info. Using it for sequences would be extremely tedious and require a lot of runs.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Yup, I used to do PCR genotyping. 50 samples running the same setup would take me a whole 12-hour day at my lower end lab.

I can't imagine having to do 50 different ones with 50 different templates and having to adjust each one. 😅 And that's for 50 sequences. How many are there in a human?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

About 25,000 coding sequences and a lot more non-coding.