Sorry everyone I know how much you love the attention she gives you, but I've implemented some quick and dirty filtering for private messaging.
We now have the ability to automatically mark PM's as deleted or read, depending on content inside of them. If we accidentally filter something you legitimately wanted (ie, not Nicole) please let me know.
If any other instances would like to implement this, here's the code. Note that you'll need to set your hostname at the top here for some reason I haven't exactly identified.
SET lemmy.protocol_and_hostname = 'https://lemmy.ca/';
CREATE TABLE private_message_filters (
id SERIAL PRIMARY KEY,
phrase TEXT NOT NULL,
behavior VARCHAR(10) NOT NULL CHECK (behavior IN ('delete', 'mark_read'))
);
CREATE OR REPLACE FUNCTION filter_private_messages()
RETURNS trigger AS $$
DECLARE
banned_phrase_record private_message_filters%ROWTYPE;
BEGIN
FOR banned_phrase_record IN
SELECT * FROM private_message_filters
LOOP
IF LOWER(TRIM(NEW.content)) ILIKE '%' || LOWER(TRIM(banned_phrase_record.phrase)) || '%' THEN
IF banned_phrase_record.behavior = 'delete' THEN
NEW.deleted := true;
RETURN NEW;
ELSIF banned_phrase_record.behavior = 'mark_read' THEN
NEW.read := true;
RETURN NEW;
END IF;
END IF;
END LOOP;
RETURN NEW;
END;
$$ LANGUAGE plpgsql;
CREATE TRIGGER trg_filter_private_messages
AFTER INSERT ON private_message
FOR EACH ROW
EXECUTE FUNCTION filter_private_messages();
To add filter words:
insert into private_message_filters (behavior, phrase) values ('delete', 'spamtestdelete');
insert into private_message_filters (behavior, phrase) values ('mark_read', 'spamtestread');
If you want to quickly disable / enable filtering while testing:
ALTER TABLE private_message DISABLE TRIGGER trg_filter_private_messages;
ALTER TABLE private_message ENABLE TRIGGER trg_filter_private_messages;
I'll leave it up to you to figure out what phrases to filter on. MAKE SURE YOU TEST. If there's an error, private messaging could break completely. You should not get an error message from the UI while sending a message with a banned word.
No lawyer / accountant is going to sign off on that. It would get flagged as fraud during due diligence and lower the price due to the risks of lawsuits and fines