this post was submitted on 24 Mar 2025
218 points (100.0% liked)

News

28271 readers
4663 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Via an unclassified, unmanaged, and unmonitored Signal channel, no less. If you or I did that, we'd go to federal prison.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

buttery males

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago

Remember when Republicans went up in arms about Hillary's emails?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

usually when politicians use Signal it's because they don't want their messages FOIA'd or audited. I can't really imagine Vance or Hegseth worrying about that, though, which makes me wonder if it's just horrible opsec, if they can't be bothered to use a SCIF or what?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

That’s exactly what it’s about. There are appropriate channels for this sort of communication, that his mobsters refuse to use because they don’t want officials gaining access to it in the event of investigations. Why did Trump tear up and eat official presidential notes? They don’t want a record for light to be shone on.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

In Goldberg’s own write-up in The Atlantic he mentioned the admin has, in the past, had an odd fixation on him.

It’s possible this was both gross negligence of national security and an attempt to entrap the journalist into being a leaker/whistleblower; creating a convenient excuse to target Goldberg and disappear him to El Salvador.

I have met him in the past, and though I didn’t find it particularly strange that he might be reaching out to me, I did think it somewhat unusual, given the Trump administration’s contentious relationship with journalists—and Trump’s periodic fixation on me specifically.[…] It is not at all uncommon these days for nefarious actors to try to induce journalists to share information that could be used against them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

Dude better get himself a good security detail and disappear for a while.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah, this shit is on purpose. These people have no respect for national security (and no respect for our allies), so it makes sense to me that at least one of them is playing dumb games. Pete should have never risen to this position in government.

As it stands, people who like the trump admin will see nothing wrong with these messages (if they even read them). Maybe they'll even think those goobers are doing a good job.

The people who hate the trump admin will not change their opinions of them after this (it can't possibly be lower for most people who hate these fascists). Critiques of the signal meeting will be met with comments like "so the journalist should be in jail for leaking!" or "Does it matter? Look at trumps men going after the terrorists! Do you love terrorists or something?"

Facilitating the of leaking this stuff is win/win if you don't value the lives of military personnel, records acts, security clearances, international opinion, etc.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago

Fucking moron traitor cunts.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Imagine these fuckin' idiots in charge if America was attacked by other countries. Sadly, it's definitely not farfetched

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Probably now they plan to jail the journalist for receiving confidential information

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

Consequences any moment now...