this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
303 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24776 readers
3252 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A federal judge on Tuesday ordered the Trump administration to halt its efforts to arrest and deport a 21-year old Columbia University student who participated in pro-Palestinian demonstrations until the court says otherwise.

The administration has been seeking to arrest the student, Yunseo Chung, since earlier this month, according to a lawsuit filed by Ms. Chung’s lawyers.

The judge, Naomi Buchwald, said during a hearing on Tuesday that “nothing in the record” indicated that Ms. Chung posed a danger to the community or a “foreign-policy risk” or had communicated with terrorist organizations.

Ms. Chung is a legal permanent resident. She was not a prominent participant in demonstrations on Columbia’s campus; she was arrested along with several other students this month at a protest at Barnard College, the Manhattan university’s sister school.

MBFC
Archive

all 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 34 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

"Your Honor, we did not deport the woman in question. The woman chose to take a one-way trip to El Salvador to tour its prison facilities. Her flight just happened to have been on the same flight as a large group of Venezuelan gang members that were being deported at the same time. To show her there were no hard feelings between us, we opted to offer her a free seat on the flight. It was an offer she couldn't refuse. "

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

"Breaking news on the flight of gang members heading to El Salvador. Violence erupts on the plane mid flight as the permanent resident who voluntarily went to tour the prison in El Salvador decides to join the ranks of the Venezuelan gang and gets jumped in. Authorities could not intervene in the violent ritual due to fear of losing control of the plane, making her the latest person to be added to the list of prisoners as she is now a full member of the gang. Authorities claim she was given the option of being deported to her home country in South Korea but chose to go to the prison with the rest of the gang members instead stating they are her new family. Her status of permanent resident has been revoked and she is no longer allowed in the country."

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

So they'll try to kidnap her illegally anyway. Hope she can find a way to stay safe.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 months ago

There's no private security group that would risk being blackballed by the toddler in chief

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago

Orders. Asks. Calls for.

They don't fuckin care.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 months ago

What's a court order for if not to be defied?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (4 children)

Only in the US, can someone come here, get residency, and then protest against that same country that gave you a chance. It's just crazy.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 3 months ago (1 children)

What's crazier is that you think that legal residents don't deserve a first amendment right despite doing so much more to have earned rights than any person who just happened to have been born here did. Fuck outta here with that shitty-ass take. All rights for all Americans, full stop.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (3 children)

But, no kind of punishments right? These "legal residents" want the best of both worlds. They want to cause chaos on campuses, protest a country that gave them a better life, and then cry that they don't deserve to be punished. It's ridiculous. Go to any other country on Earth and do the things these students did, and see how long you last..

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

People claim to support the Constitution and then say dumb shit like this. Try reading it. It's not very long. It very clearly spells out that everybody in the country has rights, and that one of this rights is the right to peacefully protest. You're even exercising that same right by arguing that they shouldn't have these rights. But they do. And the second you try to take that away from them, what's to stop a dictator on the other side from deciding that you don't deserve the right to disagree with your government anymore, and so cops will be authorized to break into your home and kidnap you and deport you to a country you've never been to.

Any argument you have about how that isn't the same thing is just going to cement how xenophobic and racist you are, so instead of bothering to reply, just sit with your thoughts and figure out what you can do differently moving forward to develop some amount of empathy and critical thinking skills to not advocate for things to get shitty for everybody in the long term. It's possible to grow and improve, and I'm rooting for you.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The constitutions also says the POTUS and the federal government have broad authority over immigration matters. Trump is doing what's in his power....and both sides are going to disagree because the Left (you) want all these non-citizens to have rights. While the Right (Me) want him to do exactly what he said he was going to.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Step 1: proclaim that immigrants no longer have rights.

Step 2: accuse person(s) you don't like of being an immigrant.

Step 3: because immigrants don't have rights, due process is not given.

Step 4: accuse person(s) of literally anything you feel like and order whatever sentence you decide is appropriate since an accusation is now also a conviction.

Are you getting it yet? Or will it have to target you specifically before you give a shit?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

ILLEGAL immigrants... let's not confuse the two. I know your side is great at doing that. This isn't about "who I like" it's about enforcing the law. Just because you hold a card, or a "status" as some kind of immigrant, it doesn't mean your immune to deportation. If the government deems you've abused your status, they can deport, just like any other government from any other country in the world. The reason we're in this mess is because of people like you, that want all these rights and privileges given to non-citizens, so that it gets tied up for YEARS, and those illegal immigrants end up in the system...literally, with nothing happening. Next thing you know, they're being deported and the left starts crying.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Lol okay, keep not understanding. You aren't putting together that rescinding rights guaranteed to people means that all you need to do is claim that somebody is in that group that doesn't get rights and they no longer have rights to things like a trial. I could literally just call you an illegal immigrant and you'd never get the opportunity to prove otherwise because you wouldn't have the right to anymore.

As for the "ILLEGAL immigrants" thing, there's a difference between civil offenses and criminal offenses. If you don't even know that, then idk where you get off thinking you get to lecture anybody about how laws work. I'm sorry to say that you're just flat out fucking wrong about this. Quit parroting what partisan media is spoon-feeding to you and look shit up for yourself. They benefit by convincing you to accept the bullshit that they're selling. Be more skeptical. Any time you see something on media, ask yourself who is benefiting from the message they're sending out.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Your side is literally fighting with each other over electrical vehicles. You're the last ones to give criticism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Lol what? Idk what "news" story you're referencing, but it's entirely irrelevant here. Wildly pivoting to an entirely different topic like this is irrefutable proof that you're wrong, have realized you're wrong, and refuse to confront and admit that you're wrong. This thread is also old now, so nobody is even following this anymore anyway. As such, any further engagement would be a total waste of my time, so I'm out.

Good luck figuring shit out. I don't need to convince you; the future will do that for me.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Who cares about other countries. The law is the law here. For everyone.

You don't like it, that's fine. But your feelings don't matter to the law.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

The law on immigration is on the side of the POTUS and the government.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

In another country? Can I go to South Korea, where she's from, and cause chaos on a college campus without any kind of repercussions?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago

*in USA, you can protest anything you want

[–] [email protected] 21 points 3 months ago (1 children)

"On the one hand it's genocide, but in the other hand I have personally benefited from the marginally less awful things this country does. Oh well, guess I don't have the right to an opinion"

Textbook jingoism.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Oh geez... let us know when you're leaving this terrible country.. for greener pastures...

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Do you have an example of another democracy with freedom of speech that has deported someone with residency for being part of a protest against said country?