The answer is fucking no, obviously.
this post was submitted on 17 Apr 2025
56 points (100.0% liked)
United States | News & Politics
2803 readers
805 users here now
Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.
If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.
Rules
Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.
Post anything related to the United States.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
If it were obvious to them, they wouldn't be hearing arguments.
Yeah, cause they need to figure out how to get Trump what he wants even though it's clearly dead-brained as fuck.
Yes, that's what I'm saying.
feel like this is the first headline I've seen to use "oral arguments"
That supreme court vernacular. There are many written arguments made prior to the case being heard, then they "hear oral arguments" in court before making a ruling.
Thank you!
8-1. Clarance Toad being the only dissenting opinion and he will write an essay about for 30 pages. Saying nothing but that he should have never been confirmed. Thanks Joe Biden.