can't wait to see which former faux news producer gets the gig.
this post was submitted on 22 Apr 2025
529 points (100.0% liked)
News
30352 readers
2853 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sounds like maybe we should be more interested to see what Bill Owens does next.
Pete Hegseth is going to be needing a job soon.
can't wait for all the sweet puff pieces with conservatives.
Is this a crack pipe joke
You used the word right (an ordinarily would be a wonderful pun), but just in case, I want to point out that "faux" is provided "foe" and not "fox".
It appears one of them will be looking for a new job soon, so this is good timing.
"this show is so important, it must continue, but instead of dying on that hill and getting fired, I'm gonna quit so I can be replaced by someone who won't rock the boat"
Isn't it amazing how so many people have used the reasoning "I want to fight fascism, and I think the best way to do it is to quit and give my job to a fascist"?
Yeah, I agree. Force them to fire you. Resigning in protest has no benefit when the powers that be have no ethics whatsoever.
Yeah, you'd think a guy in that position would be smarter. If you don't fight facism, you've already lost.
Although he could be afraid I guess.
probably looking for another gig.
It's the same as all the times you hear about small companies "making it" because they managed to get bought out. IMO, just like how I don't think success is using money as a high score, I don't think "fighting fascism" means washing your hands of anything to do with it.
I think there's some distinction there. The founder selling out is one thing. But private equity, VC, etc all want a return on their investment and once you IPO, you become a fiduciary. Those companies produced a tool and sold it to a customer that by definition is required to be unethical.
But I agree that fighting implies an active component to it.
I wonder if this lawsuit could also affect The Late Show with Stephen Colbert.
on the bright side, maybe Colbert will have to go back to doing The Colbert Report
That show wouldn't work anymore, Colbert got out of that at the exact right time. No matter how ridiculous of a parody of the right wing he could come up with, the real life idiots would be saying and doing things even more ridiculous the next day.
basically Onion is no longer relevant as well.
lol, that's true. good point
That would be a net benefit for society.
Comedy Cental is owned by Paramount, which also owns CBS. It's more likely the Daily Show would be a casualty.
You've got fascists in charge. It's going to be a hard fight to keep any kind of free press or broadcasting going.
I sure hope so. Colbert is a pompous dick.
Challenges to the citizenship birthright, bypassing due process and courts, deporting legal residents, putting them in a famously brutal concentration camp, and now taking more news media companies captive under the accusation that they're the "lying press." Yep, totally normal.
approval for a merger with Skydance Media
NO
STOP IT
Actually enforce anti-trust instead
That department has been RIFed.
I mean tbf people have been calling 60 minutes a legacy production of the bygone era of quality journalism for years now.
You're half-right.
It's real, researched, well-produced journalism which is definitely a relic of the past at this point.
I don't think that's what you were saying, though. Since your opinion hinges on what "people have been calling" it, I think you probably don't watch it and believe that since it's an old show and format, it must be inferior to.. sound bites, inflammatory remarks, click/rage-bait, "X slammed Y," etc.
And that's sad.
Actually I did use to watch it quite often.
My point was not that it dropped in quality, it's just that it became slow to keep up with ongoing events with details and information readily available via basic OSINT on primary sources or even regular quality news outlets.
Ex: https://youtu.be/dRRJmOTCqqQ
Pretty much everything presented in this report was already well known and available for months, making the the rest essentially a PR moneyshot for the US Navy.
I still watch it occasionally for its direct interviews with select people, but it's still a legacy production that struggles to keep up with info you can get even from AP or Reuters.
Mind you it's still miles better than flaming trash like Washington Post or NYT, but I could easily see CBS axeing it years ago.
It's been in decay for a while, thanks to corporate and ultra-conservative ideological interests leaning on it. A lot more of the content has drifted towards anti-immigrant fearmongering, pro-war jingoism, and paleoconservative fixations on Big Government (in the form of social programs rather than police power) and public debt. The parade of hagiographies for the ultra-wealthy and the endless pumping of tech sector vaporware haven't been great, either.
But enshittification has been strangling every major television news publication for a long while now. Owens isn't exactly a radical. He made his bones giving Bush Jr an hour long platform in between 9/11 retrospectives on the eve of the 2002 election and then spent a big chunk of his career producing glossy sports media spreads for the benefit of some of the most shamelessly corrupt billionaires in the country. Since taking the "60 Minutes" producer's desk, he's bent over backwards to accommodate the studio's biggest advertisers.
If the job is too miserable for him now, I have to assume it is because he is just answering angry phone call after angry phone call from a corporate advertising base that's plunged right off the reactionary cliff.
I mean, they are also responsible for making news a for-profit enterprise, which has arguably ultimately killed it.