this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2023
15 points (100.0% liked)

UK Politics

6 readers
1 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and either a link to reputable news source, or be a text post.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

We are friends with [email protected], a uk news community on a more general site.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

It's a smart, pragmatic move, to keep on the good side of the world's most powerful media mogul but it's infuriating that any politicians are obligated to attend private meetings with him

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

What does that mean? That Labour have to do what Murdoch tells them? Or offer him something?

I don’t think it’s smart. I think it raises much bigger issues of the influence that bullionaires hold over the (supposedly) democratic political system.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

This. A cautious, managed Faustian pact. Sadly necessary.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Starmer doesn't need Murdoch. The Tories have imploded and no one believes their garbage media anymore. It is one thing talking to him, but remember he is not British and doesn't pay tax here. We owe him nothing except better legislation to bring our shitty media to account.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

We owe him a hefty prison sentence for crimes against humanity.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Can't even call them champagne socialists any more.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

If it was good enough for Blair it'll be good enough for Starmer.