this post was submitted on 02 May 2025
254 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23431 readers
2722 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 60 points 1 week ago (2 children)

If there are ever free elections again and Democrats win, there must not be a "return to normal" like Biden tried.

Democrats must do everything that Trump did. Republicans must be taught about consequences. Being respectful of the office didn't work. It only emboldened Republicans to be more deplorable.

Republicans can then campaign on the "return to normal" platform. If they want reason, they need to become the honorable party.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I heard something recently that really resonated. For fascists, the government is just a tool they can use to reach their goal.

They don't recognize the rights outlined in the Constitution, the duty inmate to holding office, or the importance of the rule of law. It is just a weapon to wield against their enemies and can be discarded when no longer useful.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

the frustrating thing is this is well known if you know who to listen to. abolitionists, union organizers, civil rights activists, hippies, punks, hip-hop artists, academics. they all been saying it

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (2 children)

no. absolutely not. democratics bypassing law is not acceptable. a good trump is not what I or many want. That being said democrats need to get rid of things like citizens united and the patriot act and shore up civil rights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

They don't need to bypass laws. If a judge rules against them they can comply.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Trump deserves a short drop and a sudden stop but we don't always get what we deserve.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Much too quick and much too painless.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

I don't delight in suffering, I just want him gone asap.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

If it's on the table, I'll accept it, even though I too would want more

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I don't normally promote using windows but in some instances it is the best solution for the job.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 week ago

When billionaires have tax exemption and actual academia doesn't. America really is a clown country.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Man.. come 2028 I don't want to hear shit from Democratic candidates that doesn't involve an exhaustive list of all the awful shit Trump did and what steps they will take to undo all of it. Sorry chum, you picked a bad time to run so you don't get to have an agenda that isn't 'pulling Trump's dick out of this country's ass because it's fucked enough already.' Cause if you're not willing to undo this shit I really don't care what else you have to say.

(Yeah, bring on the downvotes, I can take the heat.)

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Prepare to be disappointed.

"Preventing Trump from doing exactly what he's now doing" was somehow not a good enough reason for Americans to vote for the brown lady. Or the white lady, for that matter.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

It's the Democratic Party, if you don't go into it already prepared to be disappointed you haven't been paying attention. :P

And I'm not talking about whether not they win, I'm saying their campaigns should consist solely of 'here's a list of things Trump fucked and that I am going to unfuck.'

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (6 children)

Look, I'm going to be honest, if a Progressive or Democrat on the campaign trail says they would use all of the powers granted to trump against all Republicans in a goose and gander situation, they'd have my vote.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

“All billionaires will be summarily executed and their assets will be distributed to the citizenry, and the Heritage Foundation will be declared a terrorist organization, and all current and past leaders, funders, employees, and judges endorsed by them will be immediately sent to a prison camp in El Salvador” seems like a winning message.

And anything the president wants only needs an executive order, it seems, so it should be pretty easy to implement.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It shall be unlawful for [the President] to request, directly or indirectly, any officer or employee of the Internal Revenue Service to conduct or terminate an audit or other investigation of any particular taxpayer with respect to the tax liability of such taxpayer.

[...]

Any person who willfully violates subsection (a) or fails to report under subsection (b) shall be punished upon conviction by a fine in any amount not exceeding $5,000, or imprisonment of not more than 5 years, or both, together with the costs of prosecution.

26 U.S. Code § 7217

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago

Counterpoint: 'When the president does it, that means it is not illegal' now has the weight of SCOTUS behind it. :/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

And Trump has proven it means fuck all.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I bet the newly reinstated Trump University would get all the tax exemptions they need.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Even after they caved to what the fascists want lol.

For all those smahts they sure are stupid enough to capitulate to fascists.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did they cave? I thought Harvard was the one that didn't cave. Columbia and others caved.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

They did. They quietly ended programs that helped LGBTQ and minorities and ended DEI required statements for tenure positions.

They also handed over students school records to DHS.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Last I heard was a couple weeks ago them stating clearly that they would not comply, and doing a bit of searching I can't find anything more recent that contradicts that stance... Where did you see that they'd reversed that decision?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Why does no one ever learn that capitulating doesn't get the fascists off your back?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago

talk about picking winners and losers. always projection. always.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Now revoke tax exempt status for churches.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago (1 children)

…wait, why the fuck are they tax exempt exactly?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

because they teach people and the govt thinks that education is important

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

because they teach people and the govt ~~thinks~~ thought that education ~~is~~ was important

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Just not education that talks back.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You could elect a cabinet composed exclusively of orange cats united by a single and solitary shared braincell, and they wouldn't be as idiotic.

They'd be idiotic, for sure. They'd be entertaining as well. But at least they wouldn't be malignantly idiotic.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Donvict is such a WATB. Attacking Harvard. For fucking what?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Broken Clock moment. Private universities like the Ivy Leagues absolutely shouldn't be tax exempt, and also shouldn't be receiving any aid whatsoever from any government, federal, state, or local.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

Not even for strategic research?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

harvard is a pipeline for wealthy elitists politicians and graduates. wonder if something will shift

load more comments
view more: next ›