this post was submitted on 23 May 2025
647 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32167 readers
2871 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 202 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago

That's majestic

[–] [email protected] 104 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

These standing seats have been coming next year for the past decade, but they always failed safety tests. Planes need to be evacuated within a certain time frame, which does not work when the plane is too densely packed.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Can't they go Middle Earth on them and just create more doors?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

I think we should relax rules on how quickly it is to evaluate a plane, and focus more on keeping the plane in the sky. (looking at you Boeing)

I'd love sleeping pods or bunk beds on a plane and accept the higher risk of not being able to get out quickly.

Cars and probably even train are infinitely more dangerous and we accept those risks every day.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There is no legitimate reason why trains or cars should be more dangerous modes of transport than flights. It is just that the lobbies for cars and capitalist train operations successfully desensitized everyone to it, so "deadly car crash" is just shrugged away. In the US we see similar attempts to make planes less safe and just accept the numbers of people killed in preventable events.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

IDK about trains, but the problem with cars is that we let people operate them with minimal training and practically no oversight. You see shit on roads daily where if the driver was flying a plane, they wouldn't even be let on as a passenger anymore ever.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This looks like a pain in the balls in case of turbulence

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

passengers hanging outside not before 2030

[–] [email protected] 66 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

How people can look at (mostly) state owned rail vs private airlines and still think the free market benefits the average person is one of life's big mysteries to me.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

I mean, Trump won the vote, and Brexit won the vote... Something tells me it's as simple as most people are fucking stupid.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Watch these cost the same as standard seats, and the cost of standard seats go up

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 weeks ago

“You’re still a premium subscriber and have full access to our premium plan, but some of our options have changed.”

[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago (11 children)

Honestly, I'm pretty tall and if it gives more room for my legs, I'd like to have the option

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Finally more leg room... But now your head bumps against the ceiling and you need to have your head tilted for the entire flight

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Why do you assume there will be leg room?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 weeks ago

This. The who point is to cram more seats than they are currently able

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Presumably standing seats means standing up? Hopefully not squatting seats.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 2 weeks ago (6 children)

So I guess no putting your head between your knees in the event of a crash then, huh?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

The only reason airlines would have you do that in the first place is so you can kiss your ass goodbye.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

You need to pass yoga test to afford this seat

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

The lengths the US will go to to avoid building high-speed rail.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Why don't they do lay-down-only seats? Seems like you'd save the same amount of space or more with vastly more comfort.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 weeks ago (16 children)

The serious non-joke answer is the same as the one for these standing seats: emergency exit speed. When an airplane crash lands you have like less than 2 minutes to get everyone out before the huge inferno happens and roasts people. So for standing seats that pack even more people into an airplane, they have to prove that they can still get everyone out before the deadline. For laying-down seats they would have to prove the same thing.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Why don’t they do lay-down-only seats?

Bigger and older passengers would find it more difficult to get into the top bunk than to ride a standing-only seat.

But it's all shit regardless. Boeing can barely even make planes that don't fall apart on the runway. The American airline industry's fleet is increasingly defunct. The FAA is gutted. Airports are falling into disrepare due to mismanagement. You'll be lucky to get any kind of air travel in another decade.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Honestly, that may actually be more comfortable for me than trying to fold my legs into the tiny rows they have now.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 weeks ago

I am super torn here because pre-back-surgery me looks at these and says "the NERVE of these fuckers" and post-back-surgery me is like "Well that WOULD be nice yes"

[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 weeks ago

Honestly I didn't even realize until now how good the cropping is on lemmy compared to redd*t. holy shit the number of memes that came from screenshots of twitter screenshotted on insta screenshotted on whatever the fuck but this one was profile.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Solution: bring a cheap plastic chair as part of your luggage

[–] [email protected] 33 points 2 weeks ago

And if the plane fails, jump out of the plane with the chair and sit down/stand up as you're about to hit the ground.

You won't receive any fall damage during the animation.

(Make sure to check patch notes, this is a 2020 update exploit)

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's an idea. Flights that people can make standing, should be banned, except when there is a body of water between the destination.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Airlines: "You're not gonna believe what clouds are made of..."

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I declare clouds are not a body of water, merely a spirit of water.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (3 children)

For what it's worth: this was apparently a concept created by an airline seat company called Aviointeriors who showed the idea off at trade shows in 2010 (as the "SkyRider") and 2018 (as the "SkyRider 2.0" pictured here.) Pretty much all the news articles about it are about Aviointeriors claiming vague unsourced "plans" for them to be adopted by some future date, steeped in Aviointeriors' corporate PR speak, but the articles mostly end up being about the intense public backlash to the idea. No airlines have announced any plans to buy and use these seats, not even those lunatics at RyanAir, and in the years since all SkyRider mentions have been quietly removed from Aviointeriors' own site.

Sources:

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (15 children)

I can’t wait to see people passing out or getting injured because of these seats.

E: plenty of people arguing like people of good health will be the only passengers.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

I'm 6'6". Standing only seats would be preferable to me.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm 5'5" and I just know my legs would dangle like a child on their first roller coaster.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Next stage: inject you with strong sedatives and pack the plane with the bodies

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

Next step - put bicycle seats, reducent material for backs. Then add bicycle pedals for engines, to reduce fuel usage. None said anything about actually reducing ticket price by that, high prices stays forever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

I mean, I'm broke as shit. So if it halved the cost of the tickets I'd do it, but I'm 99% sure I'd be paying close to the same.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago

It sounds quiet ridiculous, but I also had some flights that were so short (~50 min) that it almost took more time to seat everybody. Anyway, I would love to read those safety reports. Not only is sitting better on impact, but also cramping more people in the same machine, means more people (which trend to not comprehend the idea of leaving their luggage behind) share the exit routes.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Standing still in place for a few hours is waaay more uncomfortable than pacing and walking around. Shifting the weight on our feet really helps

I can't imagine how awful these would be, especially with how cramped they'd be packed in (otherwise they're no smaller than chairs). God, you couldn't even bend down to scratch your knee.

I remember seeing pictures like this a looking time ago so I'm pretty sure they're fake bait. At best it's an idea somebody prototyped but won't use.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

If people actually pay for this it’s on them

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

If it catches on, these seats will be the base price and seated places will become premium. It will impact everyone that travels by plane.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›