this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
861 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

32167 readers
4034 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 249 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

how naive of him to think companies didn't already scrape his facial data from anywhere he might have had a picture 10 years ago

[–] [email protected] 94 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yup. Last year some Harvard students put together a demo where they used Meta's smart glasses and commercial apps to scan people's faces, find their social media profiles, and summarize info about them, like where they live, work, their phone numbers, and names of their relatives in real time.

[–] [email protected] 59 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

So basically Watch_Dogs profilers IRL

[–] [email protected] 109 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

Your "facial data" isn't private information. You give it away every time you go outside.

[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 week ago

every time you go outside.

You guys go outside? /j

[–] [email protected] 44 points 1 week ago (1 children)

But your likeness does belong to you. Try making money off of an AI movie featuring Taylor Swift.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don't paparazzi make plenty of money off of selling unauthorized photos of celebrities? Celebrities can control some uses of their likeness, but not all of them.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 week ago

True, though for now paparazzi photos generally are “here’s the celebrity in real life doing [x]” whereas AI is “celebrity never did this thing and we applied their image / voice to it like they did.” Really difficult for celebs to shut down tabloid or fan ai-generated garbage, but I think the bigger issue for them right now is film or music studios just using their likeness to keep the profits churning

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago

You're talking about the American concept of having no privacy in public. Not all countries are like that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 week ago (2 children)

It's already done, if you have any photographs of yourself on the internet. No need to fight that battle, accept and push forward.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 week ago

I suppose I'll accept it and just start pushing forward with setting fires. 🔥

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

And what if there's no photograph of myself online?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 week ago
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Did they not give Twitter their facial data when they uploaded their avatar?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 week ago (7 children)

They do, but even if they didn't AI companies are going take them anyway. Bots make up 50% of internet traffic. AI companies have ignored robot.txt entries. Anything publicly available, even if it's behind a password, is accessible since companies like Reddit sell that information.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Bots make up 50% of internet traffic.

I've read a study that claimed ads were 50% of traffic by data volume.

Is anyone actually still using the internet, or is it all ad networks sending crap to bots?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

This is my source : Forbes.

The source of the article is Imperva 2024 Bad Bot Report, but I cannot download the report. I do not know how they measured traffic. In this age of social media, I am going to guess it is by data volume and site visits.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Yes I have.

With a model I fine tuned myself and ran locally on my own hardware.

Suck it

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Just curious, do you know even as a rough estimation (maybe via the model card) how much energy was used to train the initial model and if so how do you believe it was done so in an ecologically justifiable way?

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Just curious. Do you know how many children had a hand in making your electronics?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Just curious, do you know how many trees were MOLESTED to create that air you're breathing?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I know at least seven were. It would've been more but I got a splinter and that really turned me off.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Straw-hat much or just learning about logistics and sourcing in our globalized supply chain?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Satirically pointing out that worrying about electricity usage for model creation is ridiculous.

It's already spent. The model exists. It's probably MORE moral to use it as much as possible to get some positive value out of it. Otherwise it was just wasted.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 week ago

FWIW the person I asked did reply, they don't care : https://lemmy.world/post/30563785/17397024

Hope it helps.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Don’t know. Don’t really care honestly. I dont pay for hydro, and whatever energy expenditures were involved in training the model I fine tuned is more than offset by the fact that I don’t and never will drive.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 week ago (14 children)

Don’t know. Don’t really care honestly [...] offset by the fact that I don’t and never will drive.

That's some strange logic. Either you do know and you can estimate that the offset will indeed "balance it out" or you don't then you can't say one way or the other.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Just curious, do you know how much energy went into powering every computer and office room for 3 years while the latest videogame/hollyowood movie/etc was being made used up?

Should we ban every single non-essential thing in the world or only the ones you don't enjoy?

And please hop-off Lemmy, do you know how much power the devs used to program this site!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Feel free to explain the down votes.

If it wasn't clear the my point was that self hosting addresses mostly privacy for the user but that is only one dimension addressed. It does not necessarily address the ecological impact. I was honestly hoping this community to care more.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 week ago (5 children)

What's clear is that you don't realize how much energy AI actually uses up and you ate up propaganda that you are spreading right now. A querry that runs for 20s to generate an image on a card that uses up at most 350W/h during heavy gaming sessions isn't magically going to doom the world. Chill out.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I've given up and assume that my friends and family have already handed over my contact info, pictures, messages, DNA, etc

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Honestly giving up is reasonable. We need EVERYONE to respect privacy for this whole thing to work.

You could be the most privacy focused individual and your mom's facebook page would still have your graduation picture with name of the highschool you went and your home address in the back somewhere.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 week ago

ITT: People expecting the most basic of logic from a blue checkmark's brain.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

I remember years ago someone in my class decided to make Russian look alike pictures of everyone in the class and post them as a gag on the doors. I forget what it was called, but several of my classmates were angry that the person had taken their pictures without consent and given them to some weird Russian picture algorithm.

At this point in time, I have no doubt that all kinds of pictures and information regarding me is in the hands of people and companies I don't care for. A lot of it is my own doing and some is out of my hands.

It is hard to avoid when you don't have any control over your own information because people share your pictures and your info without consulting you. All the time and without malice. It is what it is.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Pff it's easy
Cut contact with all friends and family, get plastic surgery, live as a hermit in the mountains

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (1 children)

It's cleverly addressing a valid point. If your face is visible on the internet it can be used in an ai database without your consent. That's just where we're at.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 week ago

yeah fair enough but every use of the studio Ghibli image generator is one too many

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago

Gosh so many real problems being solved with computers! I always knew they would be useful one day.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

I just saw an ad for a “training course” to “qualify” people to interact with AI as a profession.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›