this post was submitted on 10 Jun 2025
1132 points (100.0% liked)

memes

15505 readers
5803 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to [email protected]

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

A collection of some classic Lemmy memes for your enjoyment

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 day ago (1 children)

this really happened SOURCE: me, Albert Einstein who is also clapping

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Ehrm, some right winger said it on twitter, it's here black and white.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Actually just has dead, wrapped up Egyptians in his basement.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I know a decent amount of weird historical facts to know that the looted corpses are usually stored in the attic in Europe. There is also a non zero chance that if you live in an old enough house in Europe there could still be a corpse in the attic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Welcome to the Aitre St Maclou in Rouen! The cemetery was full in the XVIth century, so they built a nice building to keep the old corpses on the upper floors, all windows opened to everything can be nicely ventilated. 200 years later, they turned it into a school.

the Aitre St Maclou in Rouen

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 187 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Was expecting more of an Egyptian punchline.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago (3 children)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If this wasn't posted by a right winger farming anti lgbt sentiment I'd probably cringe at the school being excited to parade the kid around for being accepting of lgbt people.

I hope Islam gets slept by JDM so I can laugh at people like this guy.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 2 days ago (5 children)

The Japanese domestic market?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Jeffrey Dahmer Meats, (Inc.)?

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 2 days ago (3 children)

People don't want to talk about this, but lesbianism is common in polygamy.

[–] [email protected] 57 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Hm, got a source for that? It's not hard to believe, but I'd need a source before i do

[–] [email protected] 124 points 2 days ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago (5 children)

I would like to know more, as people don't want to talk about it.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Not in a Muslim household it ain't.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

Is the main objection to polygamy that having multiple sex partners is immoral or that the whole arrangement is subjugation of women (because usually it's multiple wives not husbands), or some other reason?

[–] [email protected] 45 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Muslim men can have multiple wives (maximum 5 I believe) as long as they can provide for them. Muslim women are only allowed to have a single husband.

The joke is that the school thought that the kid’s family was super progressive meanwhile in reality it was super patriarchal

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Thanks, I got the humor, what I'm wondering about is what's the predominant reason people in general object to polygamy, regardless of whether it's Islam or Mormons or whatever.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just off top of my head.

Inheritance - no explanation needed.

personal time - hard to get quality time and Love is can be selfish.

Issues with accidental incest - my dad side loves cheating. I have lots of half siblings and cousins id never meet all over globe. One uncle had 15ish kids that he knew of. So I dont date my dad's race. Nope train.

The dating market - One less wife available for men leads to anger for those without one. This is why I was told gay men are more accepted in certain cultures than lesbians.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

One less wife available for men leads to anger for those without one.

Incels already exist and at the same time the most attractive men have a wife, a mistress, and occasional hookups. So it Wildente necessarily change much. Except the side pieces could have actual rights and more societal respect by becoming wives.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you want more incels, that's how you get more.

data also shows uneven male to female ratio leads to males being more violent. Specifically against women. Just look at countries with low female to male ratios. Disgusting behavior.

If the male pop was reduced then this argument goes out the window. But that would require a major war or some disease that effects only males.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Men are far more susceptible to be victims of violence, addiction, suicide, incarceration, mental illness, loneliness etc. already.

High male population nowadays is usually caused by elective abortions.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Totally agree. Which is why removing more females from the dating pool will make it worse for male populations.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

People confuse polygamy with polygyny.

Polygamy is when one person can marry multiple people.

Polygyny is when one person can marry multiple women.

Polyandry is when one person can marry multiple men.

There's no specific word for when one person can marry multiple nonbinary people.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Polyamory sounds close; if you presume that the other people would be allowed multiple marriages as well.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

When your synthesizer can play more then one note at a time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 44 points 2 days ago (6 children)

Find me just one example of a Muslim woman with two husbands.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That wasn't the ask though? They were asking about polygamy in general...

[–] [email protected] 38 points 2 days ago (15 children)

It’s an easy one-sentence way to point out the inherent subjugation of women.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

If everyone involved consents, should that be anyone else's business?

[–] [email protected] 39 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (10 children)

Consent under duress or desperation is not consent. That’s why I’m pointing out that if the polygamy only ever goes one way, there is an obvious power imbalance that prevents consent from being possible.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You're making a sweeping general statement. Polygamy is just Polyamory taken to vows. There is a problem with a lot of the people that practice polygamy in an unethical way, but not polygamy itself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 days ago (3 children)

A bit of both. The Greeks and Romans had a cultural taboo against polygamy which Christianity inherited, which means that Christians have historically been opposed to polygamy (which was not the case in Pre-christian northern Europe) on moral grounds. There is also the issue that historically polygamy has been associated with patriarchal societies in which men are allowed or expected to have multiple wives, but women are not allowed to do the same. Additionally, it is also culturally associated with treating women as property of the husband. Personally I don't have any issue with polygamy if everyone is free to do whatever but the way most cultures practice it, it's unfair to women. Then again, that could also he said of "traditional" marriage in a lot of monogamous scenarios too.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago (2 children)

If someone supports gay marriage they have no basis for opposing polygamist or incestuous marriages outside of how it subjectively makes them feel. Marriage is historically a religio-cultural institution. Without that context there can be no restrictions that don't also violate foundational secular values such as personal freedom. Secularity and modernism gatekeeping marriage is a hilarious mental gymnastics routine. These days marriage is just something to keep lawyers in business anyway. The government should just get out of the marriage business entirely at this point.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

You can oppose both polygamist or incestuous marriage if it's in a context of religious and sexist oppression, which tend to be the case in most instances of those two types of marriages.

I wouldn't have complains about polyamory incestuous marriage of free people. But sadly most of practical cases are not like that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Your view is an intellectually honest one from a modernist perspective. I would go further though and say that marriage should have no secular existence at all.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I generally agree with you, but I've heard reasonable arguments like

  • polygamy is patriarchy, gay marriage isn't
  • incest is bad for the gene pool, gay marriage isn't

These raise their own questions of how to dismantle patriarchy, or if governments should have a say in our genes, etc. But I don't think they're equivalent discussions.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Probably depends on who you ask. I'm polyamorous and I think in almost all cases where someone says polygamy and not polyamory they're engaging in an immoral power dynamic. My experience being poly though I'd say most people take offense to the multiple partners thing and polygamy is just what they're familiar with as a concept

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 2 days ago

based and hallalpilled

[–] [email protected] 23 points 2 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›