this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
731 points (100.0% liked)

Uplifting News

15593 readers
275 users here now

Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.

Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
(page 4) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (21 children)

Where is the line with eugenics being bad and it being good?

load more comments (21 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

You are the genetics they want to remove.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

I have mixed feelings about this. At first it seems great, but the line between “genetic defect” and eugenics can get very blurry.

There are many people with what some would consider a “defect” to be fixed that live incredibly fulfilling lives and bring an irreplaceable uniqueness to the world.

EDIT: I guess this wasn’t clear from my original comment, but I’m not arguing against this particular use case. I understand very well the challenges that down’s presents to both the person and their caretakers. I’m saying that I’m weary about the precedent this can set while there is no legal boundary between curing crippling diseases and simply changing undesirable (in the parents’ subjective view) traits.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

people with downs syndrome have a significantly shorter lifespan compared to the rest of society. these people would still be who they are even after treatment but would have the potential to live longer healthier lives.

get your philosophical moralistic bullshit out of here. if you were so concerned about this before why not complain about how you aren't the same physical being after 10 years due to all your cells being in a constant state of death and rebirth.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Yeah, I’m not arguing against curing Down’s syndrome. I updated my post to be clearer.

However your “Ship of Theseus” argument makes no sense and is completely irrelevant.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

something that i'm also very worried about is humans making permanent genetic changes to people, that are hereditary, but have some sort of unexpected, poorly understood, downside. like, a modification might cure deafness, but cause a different, seemingly unrelated, defect in the process.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›