this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
434 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

17966 readers
1614 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

What drives me insane, is when you tell someone something… you explain it. They just say “Yeah I know.” Even though they really clearly didn’t understand. Then they need it explained again..

Likewise I am sick of people getting ‘annoyed’ by being told something ‘they already know’.

I don’t live inside your fucking brain. You might know. Next person might not. Don’t snap at me for your impatience.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I over-explain because I feel like if it were being explained to me, I would want all that extra context.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I somehow managed to get pretty good at getting a good feeling of "did this person understood what I want them to understand?" and I adapt my level of overexplaining based on that feeling.

It's something I wish other people did to me as well, as I hate it when people keep talking more to make the same point I already got. Tbh sometimes I even wish people would stop mid-sentence if I already autocompleted their sentence in my head.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Audio communication is too slow. If Humans can't evolve to communicate telepathically, language itself should evolve to account for this. Here's what I propose:

  • we develop a mathematical formula to generate a fingerprint/signature for sentences we intent to say;
  • before saying anything, we calculate this fingerprint in our head, then say this fingerprint result, followed by the actual thing we want to say
  • the listener then gets this fingerprint result and keeps in mind; whenever it tries to predict what the full sentence from the speaker is going to be, it calculates the fingerprint for the predicted sentence and compares it to the fingerprint received at the start.
  • if the fingerprints match, then the listener reports: "I got it" and the speaker can then skip saying the rest of their sentence.

Surely this is bound to improve communication for everyone and would have no downsides whatsoever.

(Sorry, the amphetamines must be kicking in right about now).

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

What could go wrong?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

tl;dr I feel is exactly this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Yeah, plus if I don't then they fill in the gaps with their assumptions!

Actually I overexplain less now after realizing they just go with their assumptions anyway.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago

You gotta give body cues; turn away slightly, start to walk adjacent, nod non-commitally, and then wave farewell

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

So many of these comics read more as autism than ADHD.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

I do this a lot.... guilty

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

...is this loss?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago