this post was submitted on 05 Jul 2025
25 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Books

2446 readers
45 users here now

A place to discuss comic books of all types, from old to new, Big 2 to indie, and everything in between.

Floppies, graphic novels, compilations, omnibusses (omnibusi?) are all fair game.

There is only one rule:*

Comic Books is a no judgement zone.

You can talk all you want about how Rob Liefeld is trash, Bob Kane is an asshole, or Frank Miller and Dave Sim’s politics have made them toxic, that’s all good.

If, however, another user is LEGITIMATELY a fan of something you don’t like, that does NOT make them a lesser person. Attack the art for being bad, not the person for being a fan of bad art.

* I lied. There are TWO rules... No piracy. Cover shots? That's good. Interior pages, in moderation? Sure. Full books? Links to pirate sites? That's how we get things shut down. :(

I'm not saying it's been a problem, because it hasn't been.

See our sister sites!

Marvel Studios! For all the latest on the Marvel Cinematic Universe!

https://lemmy.world/c/marvelstudios

For other cinematic content, hit up Movies! Aquaman is coming soon, followed by the big reboot!

https://lemmy.world/c/movies

And don't forget Movies and TV over at lemm.ee! A good place for discussing Marvel, DC and other film and television properties!

https://lemm.ee/c/moviesandtv

Want to talk BOOK books? See Books!

https://lemmy.world/c/books

Amazing Adventures of Kavalier and Clay? Becoming Superman? John Carter and the Gods of Hollywood? That's the place!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 10 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 hours ago

I mean. It's a superman movie. What more need be said?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Ah yes, the daily beast where I go for all my media reviews.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 22 hours ago

Like getting video game news from Forbes. LOL.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Sounds like somebody paid the Daily Beast to generate hype

[–] [email protected] 4 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

Does it really generate positive hype if they said it sucks?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

I think there's a large contingent of people who see negative reviews and go "Yeah, fuck that, I'll make up my own mind."

I felt the same way about Megalopolis. Glad I saw it. When I see reviews talking about how a movie is confusing or hard to understand my general feeling is "Yeah, but the reviewer could just be dumb too..."

Confusing movies are sometimes the best movies. :) Pi, Primer, the Fountain, Cloud Atlas (I still need to re-watch that one), Life of Pi. Lot of "P" movies here for some reason.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

When the plot is deeper than a puddle, it's harder for a movie to get a good review.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 hours ago

I've only had that feeling about movies I was already interested in. Random movie, not so much

[–] [email protected] 3 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

"Any publicity is good publicity."

Not universally true, generally true. because not gaining any attention at all is a death sentence for entertainment.

I don't think it is intentional in this case though since the Daily Beast is trash and the odds of trying to coordinate a subversive campaign through them would be a waste of time.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 21 hours ago

The Daily Beast is as creditable as Diddy not being rapey.