this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
95 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

3460 readers
322 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Post guidelines

[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

[email protected]
[email protected]


Icon attribution | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @[email protected].

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube's creator liaison said the change is a "minor" update to YouTube's longstanding policies.

all 9 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 58 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So one arm of Google is making the slop and the other is trying to avoid it? Neat.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 3 days ago

Create the problem so you can sell the solution. Business 101.

It's like Vault-Tec, just without the nukes at the moment

[–] [email protected] 35 points 3 days ago

They're targeting actual creators rather than AI Slop though. Lots of creators have been talking about this.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 3 days ago (1 children)

As long as they keep allowing snake oil advertising, AI-generated content is not my biggest problem with Youtube.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

Seriously. Patients at my work listen to youtube without an ad blocker and it's just disgusting.

Today I heard "the most effective weight loss ever, using nothing but water and salt." Last week it was "Chase, Bank of America and many other banks give out up to $100k with absolutely no credit check. Last year I helped thousands of people secure over $XX million with absolutely no interest."

Just 100% straight up bullshit. I'm annoyed by low quality ai history videos, sure. But google giving free rein to lying grifters is much worse.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

And how are they expecting to crack down on this? By deploying automated slop which largely comes up with false positives and can easily be expoited for nefarious purposes, to the annoyance of their regular users?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I've blocked YouTube but they keep changing IP addresses like a fucking virus.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

That kinda sucks. I was thinking about downloading a lot of the shop and uploading it to my own channel.