this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
433 points (100.0% liked)

xkcd

12106 readers
11 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

xkcd #3114: Building a Fire

Title text:

That was quicker than usual! The cabin's sprinkler system often makes it really hard to keep anything lit.

Transcript:

Transcript will show once it’s been added to explainxkcd.com

Source: https://xkcd.com/3114/

explainxkcd for #3114

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 47 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Don't forget to put a tiny dog drinking coffee in there, too!

[–] [email protected] 19 points 2 days ago (3 children)

IMHO the cabin is second best. Teepee is the best for building fires.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Cabin method is better when you want to cook above the fire. The flames stay low, but on tee pee method, the flames go too high and scorch the food.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

I don’t cook over open flames. Only coals.

Also this is just to start the fire. You build up a larger bed after your kindling gets going.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Idk I hate balancing everything

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I have been using a Kelly kettle a lot lately, usually dump a bunch of wood shavings or dried leaves in the base and then sticks above that in the chimney.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (6 children)

As per usual, Randall keeps going after the punchline was already delivered, ruining the comic. It would be better if there was no text in the final panel.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

I for one liked the third and fourth panels

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You know, no one is holding a gun to your head. There are a billion other webcomics out there if you don't like this one.

I, for one, like Randall's more conversational style. I wouldn't want him to abruptly stop after a punchline like a stage comic from the 90s.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago
[–] AngryishHumanoid 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I feel like the last panel especially builds on the joke by continuing to divert expectations. It goes from humorously building too accurate of a log cabin, to coming back around to accidentally/on purpose starting a fire, thus completing the initial request.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The cabin is already on fire in panel 4. It is clear what happened. Then the words explain the joke.

[–] AngryishHumanoid 5 points 2 days ago

The point isn't it is on fire. The point is the roundabout way of getting it to be on fire.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

It’s a typical instruction delivery speech structure:

  1. Okay, let me tell you how to ____

2-n.

n. And that’s how you ____

(Optional) n+1. Any questions?

Hence the text in panel 4 completes the pattern.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

It didn't understand the 4th panel as an explanation of the joke but just an emphasis on how absurd it is that the character planned all along that his installation will be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

This guy’s wiring certainly isn’t up to code.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

It'd rudimentary.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago

I know, what a dick right

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Next, we'll try the petroleum refinery method. First, let's get some steel pipe, a MIG-welder and a barrel of crude oil.