Ash, who only wanted to give his first name
Allows them to take pictures of his face...
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
Ash, who only wanted to give his first name
Allows them to take pictures of his face...
Wouldn't mind governments doing this if real ones are too expensive/ too much hassle to maintain.
figure out what percentage of them need to be real for people to treat them all as real, and then put up as many false and real cameras as budget allows, with real ones being as randomly distributed as possible
I would also be interesting to know what percentage it will be. Might even be well below 50% if the fine is serious enough.
An example from riding trains in the Netherlands: If you get caught you pay around €60 on top of what the journey would have cost if you did have a ticket. That seems high enough to get people behave.
My town does this with red light cameras.
We've got two dozen camera housings, and a half dozen cameras. Sometimes they announce where the cameras are, sometimes they don't.
They usually quickly finance themselves via the tickets they generate.