107
submitted 6 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 17 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Happy lemmy anniversary PugJesus ;)

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

Thanks! Feels odd that's it's two years out from the Reddit exodus, but it feels like I've been on Lemmy forever. Guess it's because I'm far more active here, lol

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Well, time flyes when you're having fun, or so they say, ha (I hope you are). You and the other heavy posters are busy keeping us well fed and breathing life into this site, so one has to be greatful!

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

The site says the overall length is 545mm - can that really be right? I was initially going to say that it looked physically shorter than I expected a polearm to look, but I think that's just due to the width of the pole itself.

This thing has to be longer than half a meter, right?

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago

That would make it a polefinger.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

According to Wikipedia it's technically a dagger. (and they are generally shorter, at 510mm) Idk if there is a minimum shaft length to classify a weapon as a polearm but I feel like there should be, otherwise any blade on a shaft (even a hatchet, for example) could technically be one ?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Dagger-on-a-stick

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

That's crazy cos there's actually a dagger in the pommel of this polearm! Double dagger.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Just used the description on the site, I know very little about Indian weaponry (or, for that matter, debates on how much pole a polearm needs)

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago

Oh I'm not saying you were misleading, or even wrong, I even did a quick search for the actual definition of a polearm to make sure I wasn't spouting nonsense, and according to the experts, it is basically a mess. The wikipedia article even has a sizeable section titled "Classification difficulties".

[-] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Love the site you linked btw, so much cool stuff on there

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

It's really fantastic! It feels like half the things I've posted in the past month have been from it.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

How much do you reckon the stuff on there costs? It's all so gorgeous

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago

Most of it that has a listed price seems to be between 1,000-10,000 pounds, which is... steep, but not as bad as some antiquities.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Oh you're right! that's actually a bit of a bargain, I was expecting upwards of 10k for sure! I'm subscribed to the salesroom newsletter too so I do love a good bit of antique window-shopping ๐Ÿ˜‚

[-] [email protected] 1 points 5 days ago

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bhuj_(weapon) Even has a stiletto dagger in the pommel.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 6 days ago
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
107 points (100.0% liked)

Historical Artifacts

1369 readers
1 users here now

Just a community for everyone to share artifacts, reconstructions, or replicas for the historically-inclined to admire!

Generally, an artifact should be 100+ years old, but this is a flexible requirement if you find something rare and suitably linked to an era of history, not a strict rule. Anything over 100 is fair game regardless of rarity.

Generally speaking, ruins should go to [email protected]

Illustrations of the past should go to [email protected]

Photos of the past should go to [email protected]

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS