Dammit, I am confused.
In this article from BBC, it says:
The ruling is non-binding
In another article from the Guardian, it says the opposite:
Countries are now bound under international law
Which one is it?
Dammit, I am confused.
In this article from BBC, it says:
The ruling is non-binding
In another article from the Guardian, it says the opposite:
Countries are now bound under international law
Which one is it?
I think it's non-binding, after all.
Discussion of climate, how it is changing, activism around that, the politics, and the energy systems change we need in order to stabilize things.
As a starting point, the burning of fossil fuels, and to a lesser extent deforestation and release of methane are responsible for the warming in recent decades:
How much each change to the atmosphere has warmed the world:
Recommended actions to cut greenhouse gas emissions in the near future:
Anti-science, inactivism, and unsupported conspiracy theories are not ok here.