130
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 15 points 19 hours ago

By the time I learned how to create symlinks I'm Windows, I didn't need it.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago

Windows can do symlinks now? Watch out, they're slowly catching up.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 17 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

This is like seeing those php jokes in programming humor communities. Because they're clearly made by someone who is well over a decade out of date with their information.

For reference symbolic links were properly introduced in Vista(2006), but junction points were available before that.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago

MS Windows and PHP... yeah I can see the resemblance. They're both crufty old tools that are obsolete for more than a decade but still widely used and talked about.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago

So are you, it seems…

[-] [email protected] 6 points 19 hours ago

"Create Shortcut on Desktop"

[-] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago

I used symlinks with windows in like... 2007?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

You used to need admin or something like that. It's only since about 2017 that they are available to normal users by default.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It seems to have been a win 7 innovation. Personally I gave up on it after XP.

[-] [email protected] 13 points 1 day ago

Think I first used a Symlink in about 1998.

Pretty sure NT had the capability, though even the docs then advised against them.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 18 hours ago

though even the docs then advised against them.

Why wouldn't they want users using them?

[-] [email protected] 14 points 1 day ago

Hard and soft links have existed on NTFS for decades at this point

[-] [email protected] 1 points 14 hours ago

This seems to be about junctions not shortcuts (which are at a higher level of abstraction)

[-] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Or giving in. Symlinks are a lazy hacky mistake. The original Unix authors knew it and tried to fix it in Plan9, but I guess now we're stuck with that mistake forever. Even WASI supports symlinks.

https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/1267724.1267731

[-] [email protected] 1 points 13 hours ago

It doesn't matter if a bunch of crusty compsci academics think something is bad if it just works™ in real life

And I am saying this as an academic. I've seen my colleagues write lots of papers that faded like a fart in a fan factory while Unix is still chewing ass and kicking gum 1970s style

[-] [email protected] 7 points 22 hours ago

What would have been a better solution?

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
130 points (100.0% liked)

Linux

8623 readers
445 users here now

A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system (except the memes!)

Also, check out:

Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS