Is it AI? Seems not that old?
naught101
joined 10 months ago
Impressive for a first go! Is the pattern available?
This article is worth a read, despite the mildly obnoxious title: https://scribe.rip/https:/towardsdatascience.com/data-science-is-not-science-bb95d783697a
This. I've done a bit of all of it (science trained), and worked with others too. People with good science and stats backgrounds seem to have a better grasp of the pitfalls of data analysis. People with only software or data science background sometimes struggle with stats concepts.
Basically, it's easy to pick up enough coding and data viz skills by yourself if you understand the stats. But it's NOT easy to pick up statistics by yourself if you only understand coding and data viz.
Zipf's law is just a specific example of a power law. Other power laws exist for lots of different things, just with different exponents.
the jury seems out about cities. This paper suggests they don't follow a other distributions: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0264275124002592 , but this one suggests that they do: https://www.oecd.org/content/dam/oecd/en/publications/reports/2013/12/on-city-size-distribution_g17a2442/5k3tt100wf7j-en.pdf - specifically it suggests they DO follow Zipf's law, within a given country. Inter-country differences are likely due to different developmental trajectories over time.
Thanks!
Are there open bugs/feature requests about it?
You can type the hashtag in the URL on the web, and follow it from there.
Isn't that pretty much all of their behaviour?
It seems like evidence that at least trump is not an outright russian asset though, right? He's just an idiot (and they probably have some dirt on him)
This post was deleted from [email protected] in the last few hours: https://lemmy.world/post/26997415
I can tell, because I have this in my inbox:
(the *Permanently Deleted* bit still has the link to the URL).
The post title was "what's your favourite book" or something similar.
But there's nothing in the modlog that shows this. How come?
view more: next โบ
The "obviously wrong" thing is that it looks like a photo of stones, but those things can't be stones (e.g. the feather pattern, radial patterns).. I guess someone could have 3d modelled it, but it seems too random for that..
But yeah, not complaining about the AI-ness, but "old" hurts when you've been using the internet ten times longer than the thing being describe ๐ฅฒ