this post was submitted on 26 Oct 2023
78 points (90.6% liked)

No Stupid Questions

39878 readers
634 users here now

No such thing. Ask away!

!nostupidquestions is a community dedicated to being helpful and answering each others' questions on various topics.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must be legitimate questions. All post titles must include a question.

All posts must be legitimate questions, and all post titles must include a question. Questions that are joke or trolling questions, memes, song lyrics as title, etc. are not allowed here. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.



Rule 2- Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your question subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Questions which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding META posts and joke questions.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-question posts using the [META] tag on your post title.

On fridays, you are allowed to post meme and troll questions, on the condition that it's in text format only, and conforms with our other rules. These posts MUST include the [NSQ Friday] tag in their title.

If you post a serious question on friday and are looking only for legitimate answers, then please include the [Serious] tag on your post. Irrelevant replies will then be removed by moderators.



Rule 7- You can't intentionally annoy, mock, or harass other members.

If you intentionally annoy, mock, harass, or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here. This includes using AI responses and summaries.



Credits

Our breathtaking icon was bestowed upon us by @Cevilia!

The greatest banner of all time: by @TheOneWithTheHair!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You would see your normal headlights because your subjective experience of time wouldn’t change.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Surely that depends whether you’re in the vehicle (and can see the lights) or an observer outside of the vehicle

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Absolutely. The wavelengths would be significantly increased or decreased depending if viewed from the outside standing standing still in respect to the spacecrafts motion.

From inside the spacecraft it would appear normal. What would seem weird is that objects you are traveling towards would appear much closer than if you were stationary to said objects. Objects behind you would appear much farther away.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This is a technicality, but the wavelengths wouldn't actually change. They would be the same length from both perspectives. What actually changes between the two different observers is how long a foot/meter actually is.

Although even that isn't technically right either.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I think you might be incorrect. To a stationary person on the ground, the light they emit would be red or blue shifted depending on the direction they are going. Red or Blue shifting is the same as saying your wave length is changing.

What I think you meant to say is that the speed of light does not change at all. Which is correct. That has nothing to do with the wave length which can change in frequency.

Edit. Will clarify. Only the stationary person will see the wavelength or other term, frequency change. The person in the spaceship will not notice any changes in the light they emit as it will be entirely cancelled out by the time dilation.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago

Nothing. The speed of light is so fast that our intuitive understanding of the world doesn't apply, when going that fast.

Light travels at the speed of light relative to you. It doesn't matter where you are or how fast you're moving light will travel around you at the speed of light.

Imagine you're in a space ship passing a planet at half the speed of light. You would measure your headlight's beam as travelling away from you at the speed of light. Someone on the planet would see you going 0.5c and your headlights going 1c, and would conclude your headlight beam is traveling away from you at half the speed of light.

How does the universe deal with these contradictory observations? Time dilation. Time will flow at a different rate on your ship than the planet. The universe is weird at high speeds.

As far as your speed, it would be the same as turning on the headlights of your car. The lights will slow you down, but such a small amount you need a special lab to even measure it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

That's the fun part of light, it is the same speed regardless of reference frame.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

Einstein himself has actually used this scenario in his first article about relativity, and he derived the formulas for the transformation of length and of time from it

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1002/andp.19053221004

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Just wanted to say this was an awesome thread with a lot of great explanations- really interesting read, thanks for the great question!

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

If you are in the car, the headlights would look normal. If the car is driving towards you, the light would be blue shifted. If it is driving away from you (I guess you would be seeing the taillights), they would be red shifted. That is what happens when you look at the light from distant galaxies. Because the universe is expanding, the galaxies are moving away from us rather fast. Because you know the emission spectra of the stars in them, you can calculate the red shift, and that tells you how far away the galaxy is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you were observing as a third person watching in the slowest of slow motion, would the light from the headlights creep forward illuminating the void infront only slightly faster than the speed of which the vehicle is travelling?

Edit: assuming the vehicle is going factional slower than the speed of light.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You roll a 1. Power failure. Gotta reroute the annular nucleonic power convertor through the macguffin relays just to get back up to speed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty sure you can just reverse the polarity.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You always try reversing the polarity. It's not like I'm walking around with variable phase inverters in my prison pocket.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago

It would slow down a little