this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2023
544 points (98.9% liked)

Technology

68400 readers
2392 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I dunno on one side we have Google trying to wreck the entire internet and have their ads in your face 95 percent of the time.

On the other side is Microsoft who won't leave you the hell alone when pushing they're shit tiers programs and steal defaults on a weekly basis.

To me the only solution is ruling both companies monopolys and fining them to hell and breaking them up. Both are out of control and ruining computing and the Internet.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Google could be broken up into

  • search
  • chrome / gsuite
  • YouTube
  • gcloud
  • ads
  • android. And I'm sure more

MS

  • windows / office
  • azure
  • xbox
  • bing
    ..I'm too tired to keep going lol

If those had to all survive independently and couldn't leech off profits of the parent organization we could have true competition. Instead you just need one super-profitable arm of a company than loss-lead your way into other verticals and out-compete everyone else because you don't have to turn a profit, at least while the competition is still clinging on.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ads are a core component of how search makes money. They're also a core component of how YouTube makes money.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Ads are what Google makes money with. That's their core business. I would argue most of what they offer is just a different way of either delivering you ads or farming your data for...ads.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

And in the meantime, become a farmer! /s (you'd still have John Deere problems...)

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (2 children)

They should have invested in their potential, their search engines. It's getting shittier almost daily.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes you wonder if they just stopped paying they'd have 23 billion more and I wonder what they'd lose in market share. If it is less than 23 bil it makes sense to just not pay.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bing seems a lot worse now than before the pandemic as well

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago

*To stifle competition FTFY

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

Crazy that it's cheaper to do that than it is to build a product that can find recipe blogs that aren't also novels.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This validates my stubborn commitment to DuckDuckGo, ty

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Which defaults to Bing, to whom ddg sends all your queries. I use ddg.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I happily pay $10 a month for Kagi and it’s freaking great.

I’m never going back to Google.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You pay for a search engine? You have a subscription to a search engine? I'm I understanding that right?

It is a search engine right? My brain is struggling with this.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is there something about search engines, as opposed to other online services, that makes you expect them to be free?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally i find $10 a month to be too expensive, but don't we all pay for search engines in a way? With Google you don't pay directly but with your information and by getting influenced in your behaviour (e.g. to buy something from someone who in return pays google for advertisement).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This feels like google when google was new. I’ve been using the summarizer more and reading the articles I send it to understand how it works. It definitely has its use cases

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Hopefully the antitrust trial will end up telling Google they cannot pay anybody for preference of their browser. That would be the best outcome.

The MO of current "market leaders" is not to compete but gatekeep.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I'd gladly switch back to Google if they paid me a million dollars.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

how is that not anti-competitive behaviour?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Antitrust was just a nice idea. It's kinda dead. Will remain dead unless we can purge corruption from politics. For some reason, most politicians seem averse to this idea.

Luckily the party driven and heavily influential political roles are filled with diverse representatives from every walk of life and aren't largely built around the same support circles and ideals that have already been entrenched for generations. With millions of citizens, its normal for the same handful of families to remain in power, with the exception of some rich celebrities who can win the popularity polls.

Everything is fine.

As long as the rich can get more money. That's what is most important.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

You forgot to put “for some reason” in italics for extra sarcasm

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (3 children)

It isn't the default search engine on my browser. I'm using Kagi at the moment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Paid, ad-free, privacy focused search engine

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Even if it’s easy to switch browsers or platforms or search engines, the one that appears when you turn it on matters a lot.

Google obviously agrees and has paid a staggering amount to make sure it is the default: testimony in the trial revealed that Google spent a total of $26.3 billion in 2021 to be the default search engine in multiple browsers, phones, and platforms.

It was made public after a debate earlier in the week between the two sides and Judge Amit Mehta over whether the figure should be redacted.

(Apple’s outsize percentage of the total is why that particular deal has been such a focus of the first weeks of the trial.)

Until now, these numbers have been closely held secrets, leaving competitors and analysts to speculate about exactly what it’s worth to Google to be the near-universal default choice.

He also said that he sees Yelp and Amazon as competitors and that, in such a hot market, Google has to do everything it can to stay relevant and compete.


The original article contains 519 words, the summary contains 174 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Approximately 16% of their revenue or 29% of their profit. I'd take that tradeoff any day.

load more comments
view more: next ›