this post was submitted on 09 Nov 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

38384 readers
15 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
all 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

ATSC 3.0 is just a scheme to turn free, over the air TV into another cable. Ever increasing prices.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's certainly beginning to look that way. DRM ruins everything.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

live broadcasts of video without requiring wireless networks.

Do the writers know what a broadcast is and what wireless means?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean... it's not a network technically. it's a broadcast station (though the stations themselves are networks)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It still requires being in range of a (network of) wireless transmitter(s). I'd have written 'without mobile networks' or 'cellular networks' or 'data connection' or 'IP networks' as it's a broadcast and not a two-way communication.

Sure, it's nitpicking and they're technically correct but it's also imprecise wording. It's still wireless transmissions and not magic.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting. Why do they even want this technology on all phones?