this post was submitted on 15 Nov 2023
125 points (98.4% liked)

politics

22294 readers
3487 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

OP's article is a break down of this article: https://www.reuters.com/investigates/special-report/usa-politics-violence/

I'm really glad they posted this, the Reuter's article is harder to understand. My takeaway from OP's article is this:

The incidents involve violence emanating from across the political spectrum, including dozens of cases of substantial property damage by leftists at political demonstrations. But of the 22 fatal incidents among the total tally, involving the deaths of 44 victims and 11 attackers, most were attributed to assailants, like Aldrich, who expressed beliefs associated with the extreme right, Reuters found.

In 15 of those attacks, in which 38 victims and seven attackers died, the perpetrator had articulated far-right beliefs, many of them targeting racial, sexual or other minorities. Only one fatal incident – the 2022 stabbing of a journalist by a public administrator in Nevada – was carried out by an assailant clearly identified with the left.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It's a good thing that we in the US defend free speech for Nazis so that their ideas can be spread through various online platforms. If we didnt protect their free speech then they might restrict ours when they gain power. Now we can be assured that won't happen.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know that this is a phenomenon larger than just the US.

Are countries with anti-hate speech laws experiencing the same degree of increase in support of political violence and the advancement of far right parties? I know that we’re seeing this all over, but to what degree are anti-hate laws able to contain it?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... advancement of far right parties

I'm pretty sure that Germany, France, and the UK are grappling with that right now.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

But to what degree? The question wasn't, "is the US alone on the march toward fascism?" it was, "Is the US unique in where it is on the march toward fascism?"

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

German here.

While we have real problems with the far right gaining ground in Germany I would argue that it is by no means comparable to the situation the US currently finds itself in.

I mean, the USA is literally one year away from the real possibility of full blown fascism while the fascists in Germany get 21-22% in polls and currently have no chance to successfully overthrow democracy.

So yes, I would argue that the USA is a couple of steps further than Germany along the way to fascism.

[–] [email protected] -5 points 1 year ago

Ah see, someone with actual experience, and surprise surprise, it differs from the assumptions of the dumbass American assuming things.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The question ... was [] "Is the US unique in where it is on the march toward fascism?"

It was not. The question was:

Are countries with anti-hate speech laws experiencing the same degree of increase in support of political violence and the advancement of far right parties?

It's a combination question, and I do not have enough insight to respond to "the same degree of increase in support of political violence." I responded to (as I quoted) "the advancement of far right parties."

France has the Rassemblement National, with Marine Le Pen. Germany has Alternative für Deutschland (AfD). The UK is all over the place; the ones I've heard of are BNP and UKIP.

The fact that I, a far-away American, have even heard of these people and organizations suggests that they are widespread enough to reach my awareness.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Nearly every act of domestic terrorism ever committed in the U.S. has been committed by conservatives. Conservatism is a plague of violence long overdue for a cure.