this post was submitted on 10 Dec 2023
259 points (93.9% liked)

Science Memes

13800 readers
1945 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 35 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (3 children)

NaN is specifically not a number.

[–] [email protected] 70 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conclusion: Javascript is Neutral Evil

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago

Always has been

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Now that's a characterization I can get behind!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That is a valid point. Also, I learned something about JavaScript. Thank you!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well, it's something like the difference between { x: null } and { }.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's why it's in the Evil row

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I feel like it belongs more in the chaotic row

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, at least it is used in place of a number. But what about QED.?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

NaN makes for a better Chaotic Evil, QED could just as well be Neutral Evil.

However QED always stands in the bottom right corner, I guess that makes the author of this chart lawfully evil

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Unless it is Quantum Electro Dynamics.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Pythagoras: Everything that exists is a number. Except irrational numbers. Fuck those things.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

X is ten, as the Romans do

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Let x be any number. => x is a number. QED.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Do you have a version without the white lines?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

numbers aren’t real dipshits, they’re just letters that want to be special

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you change "number" to "vector" you'd have mathematicians agreeing with half of those.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But a vector is a number, no?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

A vector is a thing that can be added together and scaled in "the intuitive way." That is, for example, if a and b are numbers and v is a vector, then av + bv = (a+b)v (vector addition distributes over scalar multiplication). The prototypical example is the collection of arrows rooted at the origin on the 2D plane, where addition has a simple geometric interpretation (you put the tail of one vector at the tip of another, the resulting point is the new tip) and scaling is "stretching." But it really could be anything that adds and scales.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Not really.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's true, my great grandma just turned klein bottle years old

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

data: NaN

data: 1

NaN is 0