politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
They won't ban the nazi flags that DeSantis' supporters carry.
I’m in canada. I have protesters outside of my work window every week protesting LGBT education in school. I put up a pride flag in my office window. They told me to take it down, citing our code of conduct but no specific clause.
The way they talked about it made it sound like I was expressing some kind of extreme political opinion that I should be having on my own time.
I was… surprised. And disappointed.
Hang a Trump flag and see what happens.
Wanna bet what they'd say to a nazi flag?
deleted by creator
Sexual orientation is not political in itself. Discrimination of it is.
Even if it was a, "political viewpoint" it couldn't be banned.
So Human rights are now a political viewpoint?!?
Always have been for republicans
Lol, I guess this moron doesn't understand what freedom of speech means. This bill won't make it. Just another GOP idiot wasting tax dollars. Even if it does become a law, there will be a lawsuit submitted within minutes of it being signed.
he knows the law, and he knows this'll end up in the trash on top of a pile of drag bans. it's about pushing the overton window, making the existence of people you don't like "political" to separate it from the "normal" people you do actually like, and showing out for your openly fascist terrorist party.
Honestly I'm not sure at this point. I think some of them are high on their own supply and legitimately think this'll work.
Then wouldn't being anti LGBT be political too?
As with all things regressive, their whole truck is to treat their own viewpoint as a default state, and then try to force everyone else to argue around it, which allows them to steer the discussion and eventual outcome.
When they're headed off on one avenue they pivot, but this is the consistent direction of almost all regressive talking points.
They're never consistent. If they were, they would demonize overtly sexual content regardless of who it was targeted at. But as it stands they're fine with books involving straight couples and places like Hooters still exist.
yeah. just like the cross or christmass decorations.
If supporting pride is a 'political viewpoint', being against it is one too
Gay existence is not an offense against anyone, it's the folks trying to ban gay existence that are playing offense. LGBTQ folk resisting their own erasure and persecution (and for their allies to support them) is a straightforward matter of human rights these cretins want to deny
Existence is futile
if there was a party called the "fuck america in the ass" party, there's a large segment of the population who wouldn't have any choice but to vote for it. And the thing that would most effectively fuck America in the ass would be a real health care system, real gun laws, and a real education.
Am I the only one wondering how often Borrero meets his gay lover?
Hate is a strong word that has lost a lot of meaning from misuse... I hate the willfully ignorant.