this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
359 points (100.0% liked)

A Boring Dystopia

12112 readers
215 users here now

Pictures, Videos, Articles showing just how boring it is to live in a dystopic society, or with signs of a dystopic society.

Rules (Subject to Change)

--Be a Decent Human Being

--Posting news articles: include the source name and exact title from article in your post title

--If a picture is just a screenshot of an article, link the article

--If a video's content isn't clear from title, write a short summary so people know what it's about.

--Posts must have something to do with the topic

--Zero tolerance for Racism/Sexism/Ableism/etc.

--No NSFW content

--Abide by the rules of lemmy.world

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But on the bright side. umm. Ecomomny

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

"As you lay starving, homeless, and destitute tonight, take solace in the fact that the top 500 corporations have never been this profitable"

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

yaaay dow and stuff so happy

[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I really don’t know what the corpo end goal is, like what everyone homeless, and them owning a bunch of empty, condemned buildings? This whole thing is nightmarish. I always hear talk about increasing low income housing but never any talk of middle income. I make a decent wage but could never afford anything without roommates and even that is a stretch. Wheeeeeeeee.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

There isn't a corpo end-goal, corporations follow profits like a zombie seeking a meal. There's no long-term planning, as those in charge can jump ship at the collapse and start something new, using all they've gained.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Mixed with homelessness being a crime sure feels like government is aiming for some slave labor in their prisons

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Only in Arizona.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Democratic serfdom. Unless we fall into autocratic governance before that, or (hopefully) liberate ourselves instead.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A different story but Detroit had an issue with housing and laws that prevented certain people from buying homes, getting mortgages, applying for well paying jobs all while getting abused and sometimes killed by the police. Some of those people revolted, not all, not even a significant number. They burned down everything, including the homes they could not buy and it brought down a city.

I could absolutely see this happening again because of abnormal rents. These landlords are going to upset enough people to the point when the group with no hope for their future just starts burning it all down. Why should they care about society when society doesn't care about them? Fire is so easy to start, and as Detroit found out, so hard to stop.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think people are going to start burning their apartment buildings?

I'm all for chaos and rebuilding apartments makes me money but I'm not sure this is going to become a thing.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes I do. They did it before why wouldn't they do it again?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I dunno, the choice between squatting for a couple of years while ignoring court orders seems better than torching the place. Maybe I'm not chaotic enough!

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I agree, but sometimes reason vanishes when people are under great stress. The first neighborhoods put to fire in Detroit were the same low income, majority black ones the arsenists lived in. It made no sense to attack the homes of their neighbors but they did it anyways. The anger was as intense as the flames, no one was spared.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I volunteer to help out in any way that I can

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I feel like burning down a place… they’d have insurance to cover rebuild and lost rental income. It would be the renters who would suffer meanwhile.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (3 children)

So like, when is it socially acceptable to grab the proverbial pitchforks?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

I think it already is. I think we just need to send a Calendly to see when everyone’s got some free time and we can burn this mother down.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You need the rednecks to rise up first. Until they realize they've been duped by their (Republican) politicians,they will lick the boots of their oppressors. Once they wise up, you'll have an armed population that isn't going to 'back the blue' anymore

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

As a red neck from Florida, you underestimate how far boot lickers will take things. I sometimes legitimately fear an American Reich starting in the south. My neighbors have some seriously fucked opinions.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

At least five years ago. Probably more like 18 or 20.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't really understand what the end goal here is. They've got to realize that at some point people are going to just take what they need right? Are they hoping that's far enough away that it won't be their problem anymore? Or do rich people schools not teach what happens when workers are backed into too deep of a corner?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

The mindset these people have is the same one that is destroying the ecosystem: they do not care.

The long term is seen as merely a succession of short terms. Numbers going up is seen as proof of prosperity regardless of if those numbers signify actual sustainable growth or not.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (4 children)

How often do Americans pay rent? When they say rent was $750 do they mean weekly or fortnightly?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

If it's not specified, monthly. Otherwise it's specified.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

The only fortnights that exist in America is the video game. It's not a division of time used here.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Usually monthly when unspecified. However, I would do a ton of stuff to get my rent to $750, that's literally 1/3 of what it is now (also just got notice it will increase come renewal of course)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

convert office buildings into apartments. it’s a start.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Except for the part where you have to rip out everything and build it virtually from scratch due to the severe lack of plumbing infrastructure to individual spaces in the same way that apartments require.

It sounds great, but realistically it's almost easier to just demo the buildings and begin from the foundation.

Either way the issue isn't the ability to construct apartments and/or condos, it's the land being owned by people who either want it for a commercial use-case or it's just being held for value increase.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am fine with demoing the buidlings and creating new apartments / condos if that’s what it takes. It just seems like this wouldn’t be true for all buildings, but maybe most. You’re right that the owners of these properties are placing a huge bet on their buildings being used for commercial use again. The city should tax vacant buildings higher to discourage squatting on these properties by commercial investors.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unless that’s what I just described (a land value tax), I’m not sure what you’re saying here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's exactly what you described.

Essentially people will hold onto property in order to make more money on it through land value inflation.

If we tax the crap out of property that isn't being used, then either the tenant will do something with it or sell it to someone who will, instead of just waiting for the market to double their money while they play golf.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It seemed sensible when the economist Henry George postulated it as the solution for wealth inequality and the seeming rise of material desire that the uber-rich cause in the market. Unfortunately no one listened and the landlords won, and now we're here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

landlords with corporate money and lobbyists, I imagine. hopefully some change can happen on a city level.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

But, hear me out; Poop buckets.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

Let’s start hunting landlords, and when they’re gone we move on to the CEOs

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There needs to be a massive protest, by staying in where you live. To have shelter and four walls, should be and is a humanitarian right. We've gone throughout all of history starting with having no walls but caves, then to having huts, then to having pantheons, to finally having modern day walls and to having everything sustaining us within those walls.

And the only people that charged us, were when we visited Inns and Hotels, sometimes other people when we holed up in a room by their option. Not a lot of these greedy landlords existed then, but here they are now, upholding and upsetting the very things we've struggled to achieve.

Yet we're going to allow that?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

It's fine, the billionaires can still have several homes, and a custom yacht. That's all that matters right?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

MyNorthwest is a rightwing rag that should be ignored.

If real millionaires cannot afford rent, it's because they are wasting their money elsewhere. That, or their rents are actually in super high luxury buildings and they just need to go somewhere reasonable.

load more comments (2 replies)