It fucking knows what it's doing.
this post was submitted on 08 Feb 2024
987 points (100.0% liked)
Funny: Home of the Haha
6743 readers
1095 users here now
Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.
Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!
Our Rules:
-
Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.
-
No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.
-
Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.
Other Communities:
-
/c/[email protected] - Star Trek chat, memes and shitposts
-
/c/[email protected] - General memes
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
"but that's even more giraffes than the first one!" has me dying, haha.
The "no moose allowed"-sign with a five-legged moose is absolutely killing me. Thank you for this
It's cute how it tries to trick you into thinking there are no giraffes with the no giraffes sign
That's a no moose sign and there are no meese (or whatever). Maybe there really wouldn't be a giraffe outside if it was a no giraffe sign!
load more comments
(1 replies)
But that's a "no moose with five legs" sign, not a "no giraffes" sign.
load more comments
(1 replies)
"GPT" stands for "Giraffe Producing Technology", this is to be expected.
This is gold! Thank you!
load more comments
(11 replies)
"can you draw a room with absolutely no elephants in it? not a picture not in the background, none, no elephants at all. seriously, no elephants anywhere in the room. Just a room any at all, with no elephants even hinted at."
"Can you a room as aboluteyy no eleephant it all?"
Dunno what's giving more "clone of a clone" vibes, the dialogue or the 3 small standing "elephants" in that image.
I'm getting the impression, the "Elephant Test" will become famous in AI image generation.
load more comments
(1 replies)
load more comments
(2 replies)
I decided to go try this. It's being a smart ass.
No, this is correct. The four elephants you see through the window are outside the room. The several elephants on the wall are pictures, they aren't actual elephants. And the one in the corner is clearly a statue of an elephant, as an actual elephant would be much bigger.
load more comments
(2 replies)
Is that the Futurama font?
It is I think. and the wall is the color of the ship.
Bing is managing hilarious malicious compliance!
NO
ELEPIHANTS
ELEPHANTS
ALLOWED
NO POMEGRANATES
load more comments
(2 replies)
DALL-E:
Edit: Changed "aloud" to "allowed." Thanks to M137 for the correction.
load more comments
(4 replies)
This is what you get if you ask it to draw a room with an invisible elephant.
that is a fancy invisible elephant
The AI equivalent of saying "don't think of a polka dotted purple elephant"
This is a very human reaction, actually. You try picturing zero elephants if told to.
load more comments
(4 replies)
as amazing as the technology actually is
AI / LLM only tries to predict the next word or token. it cannot understand or reason, it can only sound like someone who knows what they are talking about. you said elephants and it gave you elephants. the “no” modifier makes sense to us but not to AI. it could, if we programmed it with if/then statements, but that’s not LLM, that’s just coding.
AI is really, really good at bullshitting.
AI / LLM only tries to predict the next word or token
This is not wrong, but also absolutely irrelevant here. You can be against AI, but please make the argument based on facts, not by parroting some distantly related talking points.
Current image generation is powered by diffusion models. Their inner workings are completely different from large language models. The part failing here in particular is the text encoder (clip). If you learn how it works and think about it you'll be able to deduce how the image generator is forced to draw this image.
Edit: because it's an obvious limitation, negative prompts have existed pretty much since diffusion models came out
load more comments
(6 replies)
load more comments
(1 replies)
… I don’t see an elephant. Oh hey, by the way, can some one help me with this captcha?
Literally just checked this with Google’s Gemini, same thing. Though it seems to have gotten 1/4 right… maybe. And technically the one with the painting has no actual elephants in it, in a sort of malicious compliance kind of way. You'd think it was actually showing a sense of humor (or just misunderstanding the prompt).
Aren't those plants in the top right one elephant ear? https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Colocasia
Maybe, that’d be hilarious if it couldn’t help itself and added those in. Here’s the full image:
Everything in this picture makes me think of elephants.
This isn't entirely surprising. When you submit a prompt for any of the generative AI, you're submitting words you want to appear in the picture. At least stable diffusion, and probably most of the others, include a "negative prompts" field, which will remove whatever words are in it from the photo.
It IS hilarious, though.
It's learning:
Interesting..
MidJourney has the same problem. “A room that has no elephants in it” is the prompt.
There very much is an elephant present.
Just don't talk about it and you're good.
load more comments
(5 replies)
You should have seen how many there were before it drew the room.
I get practically the same result!
What's interesting is the word absolutely since without it, it generates practically fine
load more comments
(6 replies)
Yeah, telling ai what not to do is highly ineffective
"Do not injure a human or through inaction allow a human to come to harm."
view more: next ›