this post was submitted on 15 Feb 2024
274 points (100.0% liked)

World News

45319 readers
3656 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 187 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Forbes dropping bombs.

Ukrainian brigades are starving for artillery ammunition—ironically because of Russia-aligned Republican lawmakers in the United States.

[–] [email protected] 101 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Yeah, I was going to comment on this, but you were faster. This is the first time that I've noticed a major media outlet connecting Republicans with Russia. So it's an open secret now?

[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think it's a secret at all anymore.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what an open secret is. Everyone knows it but few people are willing to acknowledge it publicly.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Hasn't this been an open secret for years? Does no one remember Paul Ryan talking about Russian payola to trump and other Republican traitors back in 2016?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can’t believe I’m actually gonna say this, but I miss that guy. He was a bastard, but at least he was a “normal” politician and not some batshit psycho.

And he retired to run a weed company iirc. wtf.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

I can’t find the weed company on Wikipedia (you could be right, I just looked cursorily), but he’s on the board of directors at Fox News. Also I learned that he’s related through marriage to both Ketanji Brown-Jackson and a very hardcore George Wallace stan.

All in all, I should not have read his Wikipedia, it’s destroyed the hope that I had, that he might have become normal and would be interested in fixing things.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The comment is about headlines, not open secrets. I know you read the comment, why did you respond like this?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The comment is about headlines, not open secrets.

This is the first time that I've noticed a major media outlet connecting Republicans with Russia. So it's an open secret now?

I was responding to a comment talking about the open secret of Russian connections to republicans, not about the headline. Are you sure you responded to the right comment?

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago

It’s the first time I’ve noticed a major non-liberal media outlet pointedly connecting Republicans with Russia. Which is a pretty big deal tbh.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

Surprising coming from Forbes, honestly

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, technically it is Trump aligned republicans.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So, 99% of Republicans which is the same thing as Republicans.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

90%, but your point still stands. Anyone remember the saying "Weak men create hard times"? Those are the weak men. Little bitch-boys that need a strongman to tell them what to think.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GLSDB is a pretty nice weapon. Combines the range and capability of a bomb with a glide kit boosted to altitude via a rocket. This type of weapon is new for the US as they normally have air superiority, so boosting the glide bombs from the ground wasn't previously needed as they would be carried up by an aircraft instead.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sorry for ignorance, genuine question, how is this different to a short range missile?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

A short range missile (such as GMLRS, which HIMARS also fires) does not have the glide kit. This means the missile is much faster, but for maximum range the missile has to follow a (vaguely) ballistic trajectory. With the glide kit, it can trade much of that speed into additional range by gliding to the target. This means GLSDB gliders can hit targets at further range, but being slower, it's easier to shoot down and makes it less able to hit extremely time sensitive targets. IIRC, GMLRS missiles have a time-to-target of 2-3 min from launch, while GLSDB gliders have (a guesstimate on my part) more like 10-15min from launch. GLSDB gliders can also sacrifice some of the range to loop around and hit targets from different angles, while GMLRS missiles are pretty much only top-down. GLSDB gliders are also significantly cheaper than GMLRS missiles.

GLSDB gliders go 93 miles.

GMLRS missiles go 57 miles.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Appreciate the informative response! I'm ashamed to say it hadn't ever occurred to me that a missile still needs to follow a ballistic path. I've been fooled by movies without realising the nonsense in that, given they have no 'wings'. Control surfaces aside of course. Thanks!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For additional reference, we now have video of a GLSDB in action in Ukraine.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Holy shit yeah that's a step up from drone grenades footage, nice!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Seems rather unwieldy for a weapon. Couldn't they make it shorter?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Best I can do is 45 miles.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

And it'll only cost you tree-fiddy

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I saw the photo and thought this was one of those "Taylor Swift going to X" memes. I'll see myself out.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

"Taylor Swift visits some Russians"

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

just like Germany's V2 rockets! but using proven tech

[–] BlackSkinnedJew 1 points 1 year ago

Not "their" if those missiles came from another nations..