this post was submitted on 29 Feb 2024
264 points (100.0% liked)

News

28416 readers
4058 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 66 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When you're so hard for the theocratic oligarchy that you shut down the ability of dissent to spread on the internet outside of your own country

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But now they can’t watch porn. Like every time allied troops found a computer of one of these islamic extremists groups in the Middle East it’s usually chock full of porn.

[–] SkyezOpen@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

And games. There's a non-zero chance that someone teabagged Osama bin laden in counter strike.

[–] profoundninja@sh.itjust.works 7 points 1 year ago

Well that can still watch porn. Just not the latest drop.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] SparrowRanjitScaur@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Religious extremists generally view it as immoral. By having it on their computers it highlights their hypocrisy.

[–] IWantToFuckSpez@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Nothing. Except they are Muslim extremists who say that porn and masturbation is forbidden. So they are hypocrites who just want to oppress people. Plus their views on women are fucked they would definitely murder a female relative if she made porn, yet they are addicted to it.

They also don’t just watch normal porn, like troops found cp and bestiality on those recovered computers.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 57 points 1 year ago (4 children)

It really seems like the easiest solution to this is to stop the genocide guys.

[–] ReginaPhalange@lemmy.world 89 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Oh man the amount of shock you'll experience when the Houthis continue their attack regardless of any ceasefire...

[–] Primarily0617@kbin.social 38 points 1 year ago

oh no then we'll have stopped the genocide for NOTHING

[–] Count042@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 year ago

Except when they stopped during the last ceasefire.

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 17 points 1 year ago

This is not a long term campaign, they have been extremely clear of what they are doing, why they are doing it and under what terms they will stop.

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

The Houthi's already stopped their attacks during the temporary ceasefire.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ukraine, Palestine, or which genocide?

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'll give you the benefit of the doubt since this was a tech article and they didn't bother to report on why Houthi's are carrying a campaign in the Red Sea. It's Palestine, they are disrupting Western interests for their continued support of Isreal as it kills off the native Arab population.

[–] xor@infosec.pub 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

well they claim to only be targeting israeli ships, not "the west", and that they didn't attack the cable at all...
but, gotcha... the palestinian one...
should this current one be considered a new genocide? or a ramping up of the continuous one?

[–] Sunforged@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Isreal, American and British ships.

Isreal only ever pauses it. The oppression and subjugation of the Palestinian people doesn't stop by design, in order to breed opposition to justify resuming.

[–] bigMouthCommie@kolektiva.social 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

>well they claim to only be targeting israeli ships

where did you hear that?

[–] NoneOfUrBusiness@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I mean hopefully both. The Yemeni genocide is also pretty bad so if we could do something about that it'd be nice staring at SA and the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] phreekno@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

Yemeni Houthi rebels are believed to have damaged undersea data cables in the Red Sea that link Europe to Asia. The Iran-backed Houthis had already threatened to target the fiber optic cables, which carry an estimated 17% of the world's internet traffic, and it now appears that the group has carried out attacks.

Damn, pullin out all the stops now.

[–] killpunchdeluxe@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You know if they don't post a vid showing off some shiny new submersible soon, then they probably went about it in the jankiest way possible

100 meters is pretty deep for scuba diving too...

[–] wrath_of_grunge@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sniper rifle from the surface

[–] S410@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Regular bullets fired out of regular firearms basically disintegrate in water. Counter-intuitively, putting more energy into a bullet only worsens the results, making it stop even faster.

Underwater firearms do exist, but they are not common, and even they have incredibly limited range. As far as I know, none have effective range greatly exceeding 50 meters, let alone 100.

[–] killpunchdeluxe@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Whaaat I didn't know they made those!

*googles

Looks like Russia made one during the Cold War for frogmen firefights (<-wild) At a depth of 15 ft, its effective range was 99 ft!! The deeper you go the worse it gets though, and it totally sucks on land too

Frogmen Firefights

*edit 99 ft, not 909 :(

[–] S410@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Every source I can find mentions maximum effective range at 15ft to be ~98 feet, not 909. So that zero in the middle is probably a typo, if I had to guess.

[–] Rayspekt@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago

Whoosh, that was not a serious suggestion. More on the noncredible side, as a fact.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] Argonne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder why you never talk about the Arab Sudanese genocide of black people. Doesn't fit your narrative?

[–] Linkerbaan@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the RSF rebel group funded by the UAE? It would be far harder to stop that as they are also getting weapons from Russia.

Can you perhaps vote Putin out next election?

[–] Argonne@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's harder to stop them yes as they've been going on for 30 years and barely any outcry about it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SanndyTheManndy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This calls for unleashing the atomic force