this post was submitted on 22 Mar 2024
551 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68305 readers
4129 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 122 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think people are ignoring looking at this through the lens of anti-competitive behavior. Right now there is an alternative, yes. But Apple continues to grab the marketshare in the US (and some Asian and EU markets). However, there is no guarantee that will be forever. Sure, they support SMS now, but again, no guarantee that'll continue to last.

Apple has displayed on numerous occasions that they do not care about interoperability with other platforms and have even been outright hostile and aggressive against them. Just look what happened when some kid figured out how to make iMessage work on any other platform. Sure, that kid's solution was hacky, but he was 16 years old. If one kid can do it, then there's absolutely no justifiable reason seasoned software engineers can't figure out a secure solution.

It astounds me that there are so many people defending any company that not only encourages walled gardens, but in some cases aggressively enforces it. Yeah there are alternatives, but people are lazy and seek convenience. iMessage just works by default, and so many folks get annoyed or even sometimes confused when non-Apple users ask them to use a 3rd party app to communicate with modern features instead of being stuck with SMS's severe shortcomings.

That's why I think the DOJ is justified in this. Because it is anti-competitive behavior.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Reminder that Apple has a well documented history of intentionally slowing down devices, reducing battery life artificially, and bricking jailbroken or even just lightly repaired phones. They're a malicious company that deserves to get reigned in.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Last Apple product I owned was an iPhone 3. It forced installed the Version 4 software and bricked my phone. The folks at the Apple store claimed the only solution was to upgrade my device.

I went Android after that and never looked back.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Apple has displayed on numerous occasions that they do not care about interoperability with other platforms and have even been outright hostile and aggressive against them.

Which, as a Mac user who lived through the 90s, is some bullshit. Apple wouldn't have survived if they couldn't reverse engineer Microsoft stuff to get it to work with Macs. They relied on open standards to survive, and now they're being assholes about other people wanting open standards.

I've been a fanboy for decades and even I'm looking forward to the DOJ taking them down a peg.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 82 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ignoring the users in here who obviously don’t understand how critical SMS actually is and how fucking awful it is from a security standpoint because they’d rather be armchairs than actually learn anything useful or true…

Wondering if this sudden move is at all to do with Apples announcement of their quantum encryption. US govt intel complex is probably seething rn

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There certainly is a history of attacking Apple over their use of encryption. I wonder if they're still mad they didn't get that iPhone backdoor they wanted.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Oh, they got it. Just not from Apple... If you have physical device access, we have basically zero methods to stop nation state level access

I believe there was an Israeli provided crack on that issue

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Exactly what i was thinkin

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (13 children)

If Apple cares about protecting privacy they'd use an open, interoperable, cross-platform standard instead of just making cracks like, "just buy your Mom an iPhone."

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (8 children)

like apple wouldnt build backdoors

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hope something significant happens because of this, but somehow I just see Apple walking away with a slap on the wrist before continuing to engage in anti-consumer practices like nothing happened

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They'll roll over and offer an encryption backdoor, DOJ will offer a token fine, everything goes away and consumers get a deep, hard, dry anal fuck.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago

Sue every US corporation with over 100B market cap please.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

“The one that really jumped out at me was this idea that parents don’t want to get their kids Android phones if they have Apple phones" 🤣🤣🤣🤣 i'm sorry, but who came up with that, google? i can't even imagine parents with apples buying androids for their kids, nor vice versa. how silly.

i do agree that texting and other basic phone functions should of course be interoperable.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I wouldn't get my kid something I am not personally well versed in. My parents learned that the hard way by failing to stay ahead of me in knowing how to use Windows, back when we had 98, and 2000, and Vista, etc. I'm grounded, you're locking the computer? Safe mode with networking it is, I'll print my pornographic images after they download in 10 minutes.

My mom just laughs anytime my kids misbehave. I guess I have it coming.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There are a lot more cheap Android options. I wouldn’t want to get a kid a pricey iPhone for their first smartphone.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

My kids get my hand me downs.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cheapest iPhone is $430.

Being tied into FindMy is probably worth that, especially for parents.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (7 children)

You can get a new android under $200. And google has their own feature to locate their phones.

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Rather than focusing on two or three illegal acts, the complaint alleges that Apple engages in a pattern of behaviors that further entrench consumers into their ecosystem and make it harder to switch, even in the face of high prices and degraded quality.

“They’ve written a complaint in a way that seeks to avoid weaknesses that I think the judge might have seen in that case, to add additional material so it’s not simply a reprise of Epic v. Apple.”

Rather than going after one or two discrete harmful actions, the DOJ looks to establish an interlocking pattern of illegal behavior that is epitomized by five examples, like the “green bubble” non-interoperability in messaging between iPhones and Android phones.

“DOJ has stepped back from the details and simply asked and answered the question, what are all these about?” says John Kwoka, professor of economics at Northeastern University who recently served as chief economist to FTC Chair Lina Khan.

In that case, the appeals court found that the denture manufacturing company violated anti-monopoly law by using “exclusive dealing arrangements to prevent rivals from getting inputs they need to succeed,” according to Kovacic.

California Attorney General Rob Bonta, one of the state AGs who has joined in the DOJ lawsuit, tells The Verge that the enforcers “are focused on injunctive relief.”


The original article contains 2,022 words, the summary contains 219 words. Saved 89%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Green bubble cry babies. It just means SMS. 🙄

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But you don’t understand. It’s Apple’s responsibility to make iMessage work across all platforms instead of users making informed decisions and using WhatsApp/FacebookMessenger/Whatever nth version of chat app Google is offering. /s

Bunch toddlers demanding equal playtime with a toy they don’t own and then ranting to their mom, who instead of buying the toy for their kid, sues the neighbor to force them to let their kid play with the toy.

[–] [email protected] 75 points 1 year ago (3 children)

SMS is hilariously insecure, and messaging is a critical piece of infrastructure. I’m shocked that the government has taken so long forcing Apple to play nicely with other platforms, considering international data security.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What are you asking for? For iMessage to become the standard for messaging?

It’s the telcos fault SMS sucks and it’s the telcos fault RCS is a joke unless you use Googles implementation on Android.

[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 year ago (2 children)

No, but API interoperability with literally anything else would be a damn good start. Right now Apple sues anyone who tries to make a bridge between iMessage and other standards.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Why? iMessage is a proprietary platform that Apple invested billions into. Expecting them to have API inter-op is idiotic. It’s not like you can’t text people outside of iMessage. There’s SMS, and people are free to use it. Expecting a “bridge” between two standards for the sake of having a bridge tells me people do not know how any of this works and are just parroting the same stupid arguments put forth by people that, again, do not understand how a technology is planned for, developed and maintained.

If there’s such an appetite, ask the fucking government to set a standard and ask every smartphone operating in the country to comply. It’s really that simple.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don’t bother mate. Lemmy is a dumpster fire filled with angsty teenagers who hate their green bubble. It’ll be another couple decades before they understand how the world works.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How would a third party client guarantee e2e encryption with iMessage?

And by what mechanism was that company enabling that bridge? Did that mechanism store iCloud credentials? Did it encrypt the drives the users iCloud data could have been downloaded to? Did they have access to iMessages in clear text before forwarding them?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

The entire web is built on standardized e2e encryption schemes fought for by techie nerds so that we don't have these problems there.

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I'm not a programmer, but this doesn't seem hard. The API could specify a cryptographic standard. Third party clients don't need access to iCloud data, just the API to pass message and attachment content in encrypted form with a standardized handshake.

What am I missing?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People forget the state of SMS before Apple decided to tell telcos to go fuck themselves and rolled out iMessage.

Americans would still be paying per-text message without Apple.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

All fine and dandy. Kudos to Apple for the innovation! But then they decided to keep it strictly inside Apple.

That's not how communication works. Imagine if Bell kept the telephone to themselves... Oh wait... They tried... Got sued for it... Company broke up and the whole world got interoperable telephone system that is alive to this day.

Innovation is great, capitalizing on innovation is also great. But eventually it needs to reach everyone and the answer cannot be "then everyone should buy Apple".

Imagine if DARPA kept the Internet as "Americans only"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

SMS works. iMessage works. Both work in tandem on a device and there’s a distinction which is which, therefore you get full access to and from when communicating with a device. I’m shocked that there’s this lunacy around conflating the two or expecting two different standards to work because people want to.

I want to have flying cars and breathe underwater without any equipment next, guess lets file a lawsuit forcing sub makers and car makers to go make that happen.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nothing is stopping people from downloading whatever chat app they want to use. EU has done that.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Something is stopping another messaging app to have sms fallback and be the default messaging app on iOS. It's iOS.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I’m saying this is a national security issue. The government has a vested interest in killing off SMS as soon as possible.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

You mean green bubble Chad's? I hope they didn't take away the green bubble it's the only way people know you're not in a cult.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

DOJ is blaming Apple for the failure of the Windows phone and the Amazon Fire phone. It feels a bit silly.

https://www.imore.com/apple/doj-lawsuit-says-failure-of-amazon-fire-phone-end-of-windows-phone-and-htcs-demise-all-apples-fault

Edit: lotta windows and fire phone fans on Lemmy it seems.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No, you are talking out your ass so people downvote you. Simple as that.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›