this post was submitted on 28 Mar 2024
400 points (100.0% liked)

Lefty Memes

5666 readers
10 users here now

An international (English speaking) socialist Lemmy community free of the "ML" influence of instances like lemmy.ml and lemmygrad. This is a place for undogmatic shitposting and memes from a progressive, anti-capitalist and truly anti-imperialist perspective, regardless of specific ideology.

Serious posts, news, and discussion go in c/Socialism.

If you are new to socialism, you can ask questions and find resources over on c/Socialism101.

Please don't forget to help keep this community clean by reporting rule violations, updooting good contributions and downdooting those of low-quality!

Rules

Version without spoilers

0. Only post socialist memes


That refers to funny image macros and means that generally videos and screenshots are not allowed. Exceptions include explicitly humorous and short videos, as well as (social media) screenshots depicting a funny situation, joke, or joke picture relating to socialist movements, theory, societal issues, or political opponents. Examples would be the classic case of humorous Tumblr or Twitter posts/threads. (and no, agitprop text does not count as a meme)


0.5 [Provisional Rule] Use alt text or image descriptions to allow greater accessibility


We require alternative text (from now referred to as "alt text") to be added to all posts/comments containing media, such as images, animated GIFs, videos, audio files, and custom emojis.
EDIT: For files you share in the comments, a simple summary should be enough if they’re too complex.

We are committed to social equity and to reducing barriers of entry, including (digital) communication and culture. It takes each of us only a few moments to make a whole world of content (more) accessible to a bunch of folks.

When alt text is absent, a reminder will be issued. If you don't add the missing alt text within 48 hours, the post will be removed. No hard feelings.


1. Socialist Unity in the form of mutual respect and good faith interactions is enforced here


Try to keep an open mind, other schools of thought may offer points of view and analyses you haven't considered yet. Also: This is not a place for the Idealism vs. Materialism or rather Anarchism vs. Marxism debate(s), for that please visit c/AnarchismVsMarxism.


2. Anti-Imperialism means recognizing capitalist states like Russia and China as such


That means condemning (their) imperialism, even if it is of the "anti-USA" flavor.


3. No liberalism, (right-wing) revisionism or reactionaries.


That includes so called: Social Democracy, Democratic Socialism, Dengism, Market Socialism, Patriotic Socialism, National Bolshevism, Anarcho-Capitalism etc. . Anti-Socialist people and content have no place here, as well as the variety of "Marxist"-"Leninists" seen on lemmygrad and more specifically GenZedong (actual ML's are welcome as long as they agree to the rules and don't just copy paste/larp about stuff from a hundred years ago).


4. No Bigotry.


The only dangerous minority is the rich.


5. Don't demonize previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


We must constructively learn from their mistakes, while acknowledging their achievements and recognizing when they have strayed away from socialist principles.

(if you are reading the rules to apply for modding this community, mention "Mantic Minotaur" when answering question 2)


6. Don't idolize/glorify previous and current socialist experiments or (leading) individuals.


Notable achievements in all spheres of society were made by various socialist/people's/democratic republics around the world. Mistakes, however, were made as well: bureaucratic castes of parasitic elites - as well as reactionary cults of personality - were established, many things were mismanaged and prejudice and bigotry sometimes replaced internationalism and progressiveness.



  1. Absolutely no posts or comments meant to relativize(/apologize for), advocate, promote or defend:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 17 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

16,000,000 empty homes, 580,000 homeless people

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

....mate we're talking about Australia here. Stop using US details

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

We've got about 3k homeless out of a population of around 480k. The vacancy rate is under 1% because of all the short-stay scumbags. We really do need to start confiscating short stay property.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah yes, squatters are known to only squat in rich people's homes, and are known to take good care of homes instead of letting them rot.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Good point, I guess we should just let the homes remain empty and the homeless on the streets?

I get that having your home squatted in sucks, and if you were only out for a week long vacation and come back to a break in then you have my sympathy, but the message here is ultimately pointing out that houses have been commodified and turned into vehicles for investing by the rich, rather than a right like they should be. We have more empty homes than homeless people, and that simply isn't just.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

How about we meet in the middle and let homeless stay in houses owned by corporations

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Feet first for maximum enjoyment.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Eat the rich. Take their stuff. Become the new rich! Worked out swimmingly for Putin!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do we need rich and poor when we are all disgusting bags of meat?

Meat bag equality.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Disgusting bags of meat who fight for dominance. Why do people insist on pretending that natural selection stopped with modern society?

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because a big portion of humanity realized that having access to all these resources means we don't need to hoard them anymore but a bunch of smooth brained monkeys don't wanna play ball. And despite being told by everyone else they refuse to even entertain the idea so now it's time for them to be tarred and feathered and their precious gold melted down and poured down their throats

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

No! We never realized that! People ALWAYS say one thing when they’re poor and the opposite when they become rich. The “Monopoly study” bears this out. Studies on workplace satisfaction and relative vs available income bear it out.

We are ALL smooth brained monkeys and we’re not going to solve our problems until we admit it and start working on a system that takes that into account.

Screaming “eat the rich!” is just continuing the cycle. Orwell realized this 75 years ago. Countless people have read his writing and yet we still have this tribal foolishness!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's why government should restrict individuals making enough money to warp society or the commons beyond their single vote through things like progressive taxation that incentivizes instead reinvesting the money that would be taken as profit taxed at 95% beyond excessive thresholds into the business/employees/community. We had reasonable tax rates once, though even then enforcement was lacking, then we let the foxes buy the hen house rule makers in the 70s and 80s without dragging them out in the street as we should have for attempting it, and now this country needs to collapse before there can be any hope for the people.

Hoarding capital is antisocial, and should be illegal. Illegal large scale capital hoarding should be punishable by incarceration, as greed is more effectively destructive than even hatred.

Letting individuals collect hundreds of millions/billions of dollars in capital when others struggle to survive makes as much sense as allowing individuals to tinker with atomic bomb tech in their garage. Capital is power over others. If making enough to own 3 houses, 6 cars, and a boat aren't enough incentive for someone, if they need enough for their own space program, they need therapy, not enablers.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Strange. Seems social bonds have been the real winner in human's selection process.

What makes you think it's the opposite?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Dunbar’s number.