Me too. Unfortunately deep voice also carries. Even my whispers.
Aeao
Absolutely. I'm just saying I've seen this trend with every information source
Wikipedia doesn't count Snopes doesn't count Google doesn't count
Anything can be wrong and I probably shouldnt have dismissed my efforts. I checked the links, they seemed to fit with the information I was provided.
I just warned I didn't check the charity itself for how well funds were appropriated
The guy arguing submitted a dead charity I mentioned was dead and got upvoteted.
I'm not worried about the down votes I'm just saying my information was the only information when I posted it and better information than the people who hated chatgpt. I also didn't just copy and paste. I spent exactly ten minutes checking and warning.
So that means the problem wasn't the information or accuracy. They just hated chatgpt.
Googles dead. Time to move on.
Yeah..that's what I gathered. People just want to hate chatgpt in the same way they wanted to hate snopes or Wikipedia.
I verified the link I just meant I hadn't checked if it was a good charity like I would if I donated myself.
Edit: and the guy who posted the dead charity link I warmed about got up voted. They see me using it for information searches as evil like I'm using it to make art or write a book. I use it because Google sucks now.
I know people will memorize bad information. I grew up on the border and I'm always explaining the numbers they say about illegal immigrants aren't possible. We can't even evacuate cities before emergencies that fast. Never seems to stick.
Then finding an example should be easy.
Besides it's irrelevant. You are suggesting someone years from is going to remember the web address I linked but forgot my advice of "check out if it's legit yourself" which is pretty and basic advice anytime you donate to charity?
Therefore you can't give me any personal example, you haven't cited anything from anybody to back anything up, and it's also completely irrelevant for the topic at hand.
Good job.
No one else has an answer. They were interested in having answer. I found found one.
Don't compare me to someone speaking nonsense about vaccines. That's crazy talk.
I was clear open and honest, I even suggested people find their own information. I just offered a jumping off point.
Even if ignoring I provides the answer... It's pretty silly that you think my one comment on lemmy effects the Internet as a whole. Grown-up.
Not an example
I've have no pride in my bones at all. I'll admit wrong, I even said that it was a possibility in my edit
You claimed you found the better answer, an answer I already explained was wrong. no pride involved on my end. I was very very clear about my effort. You did worse. These are facts not pride.
I'll eat that blame even with the warning. I didn't check that's on me.
Give me one example btw? "Sometimes a lazy answer is worse than no answer"
What are your examples? Lol. Complaining is useless. I provided answers.
Do your feet hurt a lot? It sounds like a lot of pressure on a small area