I was* banned for commenting an incomplete sentence.
You're on thin ice, mister!
I was* banned for commenting an incomplete sentence.
You're on thin ice, mister!
I really don't think it was that secret. Every modern Ubisoft game I've played has had multiple unskippable TOS checkboxes that you had to agree to before you can even pass the title screen, which state in no uncertain terms that they're going to datamine the shit out of your entire play session.
It is still nice to see this stuff being challenged, though, even though I'm doubtful that it'll bring about any meaningful change.
OP's "karma"/reputation score, visible from Mbin instances, is at -1435. I think it's safe to assume that OP does not intend to be taken seriously.
The fact that Patel feels the need to blur out the faces of the arresting officers should tell you exactly how confident they are in making the arrest to begin with. They're scared. As they should be.
Honestly, the new design fixes the one thing that's bothered me about the old player for years, which is the shading it applies to the bottom portion of the video when the UI is open. If I want to pause to read some text at the bottom of the video, I'm just out of luck because it's basically blacked out the bottom of the screen for no discernible reason. This new UI is a lot cleaner in that regard.
I don't understand why you'd ask that.
It's not that far-fetched, to me. $10 is a pretty weird price for a game, especially these days. Many games that launch at such a low price point tend to only keep that pricing temporarily; either as an early-access discount before the price goes up for the "final" build of the game, or it'll go the other way and go free-to-play as the devs put the game on life support. It also seems like an especially unusual one-time price for a game that still seems to be actively worked on. It's a very curious price.
When's the last time a school shooter (that made it to trial, obviously), got slapped with terrorism charges
When's the last time a school shooting fit the required legal definition for terrorism? They're completely different scenarios with different motives, you may as well be asking "When's the last time the Hamburglar was charged with terrorism?"
What part of what I said was boot licking? Or are you just as braindead as the people that do interviews for CNN and just use that phrase for anything you don't understand?
Ugh, I hate that they put the stupidest arguments front and center in stories like this.
“They do not put this same effort behind, say, school shooters or people who shoot up concerts.”
Yeah no shit, because mass shooters generally don't survive their attacks. The similarities between a mass shooting and the shooting of one person are few and far between - the motive, execution, and follow-up investigations are wildly different in each scenario.
I get wanting to support Luigi, but disingenuous comparisons like that aren't doing him any favors.
I know, it's just not often that I get to flex useless HVAC knowledge. :)
No way, it's totally for "archival purposes".