Yeah agreed. The character building in that was good.
Lemmy is basically a failure IMHO.
Reddit is mostly a superior experience for users
If you really think this and don't think Lemmy will get better then you should be using Reddit instead of Lemmy.
if you have a ‘liberal space’ and some conservative attempts to bring fascist ideas to the table, they are not flat out rejected. they are admonished for the facts inherent in fascism.
In the process of doing that admonishing you are inherently changing the kinds of conversations that happen in that space.
Sometimes it okay to take some positions for granted so you can have deeper conversations about specific ideas and that only happens when there is agreement about certain facts.
Constant disagreement paralyzes action and is the same tactic that people use to sterilize social movements.
That is actually pretty close to how I was thinking about it. I'm just wondering if there is a balance to it all that we can find. Like if existing necessarily causes harm how much of that is necessary and how much of it is exploitation.
I mean the closest philosophical position that I've seen in relation to it is peter singer's position but that seems exclusive to human-human relations (Edit 3: apparently also animal liberation).
Edit: Also if I was to focus on invasive species again currently we say that because something is an invasive species we should kill or stop them because they are causing damage to the existing ecosystem. Which makes sense to me it is reducing the diversity and possibilities for that space but on an individual level you would be saying that oh your existence is harming other creatures in the area so we need to kill you to make space for others which seems somewhat inhumane?
So the question sort of translates to what level of focus are you judging the value of something at?
Edit 2: Another thing I have against peter singer's position is that it's too utilitarian
Brazil is setting up a lot of regional cooperation. All of that under a roughly leftist democratic stance. Given the resources they have, they are in a pretty good place.
Huh good for them then. I wish them the best.
I mean I don't think Russia or China are in for a good time either. Like yes in the short term they will probably gain more control than they had before and globally more countries might take on similar authoritarian structures to theirs but it doesn't stop the clash of egos that comes with being an authoritarian country or the cost they are going to have to incur trying to maintain control over a wider range than they have before especially when global economy becomes massively destabilized (I actually don't think it can collapse in the normal sense that we are used to)
As for workers in the West I think it is a bit of a wait and see. They could be under a "good" government and the new jobs actually help with stabilizing the economy if combined with unconditional support (UBI or similar) during the transition or they could take the easy way out and use cheap labor from prisons and hope that consumers accept lower quality.
Also what is Brazil's plan?
Edit: put good in air quotes
I think that will change over time as developers choose specific features/platforms to work on and when admins start customizing how their instance displays info more heavily instead of just cosmetic or federation changes.
No they do not want government. If you want a more accurate description of anarchism ask this on the anarchist community.
How about a game where the monsters that you defeat give certain nutrients and allow for certain moves to be cast.
Also it would be cool if the monsters didn't exclusively attack the players, they could attack/help each other plus they could reproduce so it could mimic the ecosystem idea that senshi talked about.
Personally something that I would love to see is a lot of Temporary autonomous zones popping up at once and staying up for as long as possible and moving to another area if necessary. This way people are able to one learn/practice how to live together without the government so when those services start to fail or become hostile they will have alternatives. It will also be important for these spaces to be defend-able and movable.
Something that had sad moments and I think is often overlooked is Gene of AI. It is more of a philosophical anthology series though rather than a show that builds up characters to hit you with emotional baggage.
~Anti~ ~Commercial-AI~ ~license~ ~(CC~ ~BY-NC-SA~ ~4.0)~