Ferrous

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 10 points 10 months ago (4 children)

What are you saying? That leftists aren't adequately critiquing the things Trump says?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

That cat sure does love lasagna.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

This new inquiry will surely be the end of his campaign.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Christ almighty you just sent the goalposts into orbit.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

76% of the nazis killed in WWII were at the hands of the Soviets.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago

The reason we're seeing libs get into such a tizzy about it all of a sudden is because it's finally being pointed inwards.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"Akshually sweaty, banning the leading fascist networking tool during a period of unprecedented fascism would make the president a dictator"

Good lord. Imagine being this lib. Even if Biden wins and we stave off fascism for 2024, it won't be long until we fully backslide if this the height of liberal analysis. Utterly toothless.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (3 children)

So dictators are people who do the absolute minimum to halt fascism. Got it.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (5 children)

So all of these obstacles that you list as reasons to why Biden is so ineffective - why didn't he just nominate an AG who'd give him a free pass to do anything he wanted - like Trump? Why isn't Biden bending the rule of law to halt fascism?

The answer is because you cling to "precedence" and "civility" so hard that you'd rather see a fascist takeover before a democrat disobeys your precious rules and processes that were set up by 30 year old slave owners. To liberals, the rule of law takes precedence over a fascist takeover. It is bizarre.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago (8 children)

So let me get this straight... you hold (one specific reading of) the first amendment to be so sacred, that you'd sooner follow it and allow its dissolution by fascists, than deplatform the fascists who wish to dissolve it?

You'd sacrifice your constitution and nation just so that you could have the moral benefit of having followed it?

[–] [email protected] 17 points 10 months ago (45 children)

Get real man. Tik Tok was never about China. It was always about silencing support for Palestinians. This is known.

Why do I feel like you're the type to argue that fascist rhetoric is protected under the 1st amendment? If you think fascists deserve a platform, you are the bad guy. This is liberalism.

view more: next ›