I expect with the amount they're investing in FCEVs that EVs will only last another decade-ish.
Hexadecimalkink
Oh the motive is probably because NATO is an organisation that overthrows governments like Libya. They probably wanted to see what NATO was planning on doing in Niger or another country they want to exploit.
Hey I'm curious what the bad things they did were? I just know them to have revealed evidence of heinous war crimes committed by the USA.
I've seen enough films to know someone broke their time machine
There were several goals stated. It's clear to anyone with a modicum of intelligence that denazification was meant for domestic politics. The Minsk accords were never implemented and Merkel bragged about it being a small tactic to arm the Ukrainians. I suppose we'll see who ends up writing the history books to see which of us is right.
I don't think there's any good reason for two countries to go to war. It's weird you would say wanting land is a justification. Russia's stated reason was and is for a security buffer against NATO. It's not justified but I don't understand why you're pretending it's not the reason.
You can be dismissive of the reality of people outside of your bubble, however this is the pragmatic reality in the world. I do enjoy people taking the time to write comments that show their worldview is being shattered.
Oh I'm fairly certain that's what happened.
So it's better when they try to hide it?
Isn't that happening with Putin now?
There are two types of hydrogen cars: Fuel Cell EVs and ICE built to run with hydrogen fuel. Both of them are the future of fuel. You won't see a network of EV charging stations in most south american, african, or Asian countries. The EV revolution is very urban focused. Hydrogen as a fuel that can be transported almost as easily as gasoline is the pragmatic future. EVs are popular because Elon Musk went viral.
Edit: totally aware it's not successful at the moment: https://www.motor1.com/news/693449/toyota-hydrogen-mirai-not-successful/