Jallu

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

If someone is interested about Kagi vs Google (made by Kagi): https://mastodon.social/@kagihq/113971972586118949

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The dog made a distraction big enough for the guy to escape the moose. It might had been a different kind of result if the moose had kept it's focus on the guy.

Big thumbs up for the dog and a thumbs up for it's owner.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago

I guess the username explains the response totally.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Not to be smart, but just in conclusion: it'd have been pretty special, if they had broken down Linux and Windows with the same patch.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Wait until you learn about CrowdStrike breaking Linux systems as well.

Just kidding, no need to wait, here's one article about it: https://www.neowin.net/news/crowdstrike-broke-debian-and-rocky-linux-months-ago-but-no-one-noticed/

[–] [email protected] 38 points 10 months ago

AI in the tent:

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

Type F plugs also works with the type E sockets. Superior.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Glad you asked. To be clear: I agree with your original comment.

I had this great, long, message drafted in my mind while in sauna, but I discarded (forgot) that one when I got back to the computer.

Let me elaborate my first reply. We have in the OP image the following actors: Musk and the challenger.

I think that he should have avoided the interaction with musk, if he planned to convince Musk of something.

  • (#1) According to my previous knowledge about Musk's interactions wherever in the world of Internet, I have come to the conclusion he is not the one to be convinced even with proof.
  • (#2) If someone can challenge him during the interaction, he will most likely (always) counteract with snarky responses or just ignore the challenger totally. Like seen in the OP image.
  • (#3) The challenger tried to convince him with proof.

If he planned to educate the general public, his approach is totally fine, though.

  • (#4) Whilst the challenger commenced #3, he was really proofing the point/educating the public of the #1.

I like to think I managed to represent the Musk-like interaction in my previous reply; responding to your well built message with a snarky comment. Although, I think, I went too far with the dual interpretations.

E: Why is your reply being down-voted? My previous should be the more down-voted one. I also made a little correction to this message.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Are those two things not the same?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Pretty nice. We have the police trained 36 months (Bachelor's degree, here's more about it).

Some could say there's a difference.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)

404 Not Found

nginx/1.24.0

🥺

view more: next ›