this post was submitted on 29 May 2024
1782 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

13995 readers
2417 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
1782
submitted 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 335 points 10 months ago (2 children)

TwitterBoy showing his blatant ignorance against one of the people who literally invented modern machine learning.

Nothing shockingly unexpected from the very stable 10D chess master genius of course, but oh my, how embarrassing it must be for all the people working for him.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago

I'm sure he can be forgiven for not knowing the name of a scientist whose work his employees build upon

The fact that he didn't believe them when they claimed to be a scientist though

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 224 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I wonder if Elon chose a timeframe of 5 years because Yann LeCun won the Turing Award in 2018.

[–] [email protected] 150 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I don't think he deserves that much credit

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 10 months ago

That gives him too much credit.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 10 months ago

He's a dumbass. There's actually no rhyme or reason why he chose that specific number.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 10 months ago

He isn't that smart.

[–] [email protected] 152 points 10 months ago (7 children)

The Internet as a whole seems a lot less interested in actually listening to anyone with credentials to back themselves up (Musk obviously included).
Literally, people will just "nuh-uh" a piece of fact for purely emotional personal reasons.

Maybe it's that we made the Internet so full of disinformation that everyone is just automatically refusing to listen to others, maybe we have created a social group that just assumes they are more educated than everyone else cause they read some stuff in the internet.

Maybe all the smarter people with credentials have done the smart thing and left the internet, cause if I hear one more person tell me I'm wrong and that people totally explode in the vacuum of space cause they watched a movie. (Someone even called me confidently incorrect after I provided the research paper I cited when working on decompression in a vacuum), I honestly will think humanity has no right to claim themselves master of any part of nature and I will praise the universe for wiping us out hopefully Armageddon style, with an asteroid with a bunch of oil drillers on it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 10 months ago (2 children)

It was true before the internet too, there was just less opportunities to witness it because you didn't interact with thousands of strangers at once.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

Well... Yeah that probably checks out. I have met an engineer who was sure 9/11 was planned demolition even though we literally sat and did the math to prove it was essentially a damaged free fall with no outer explosions... And a biologist major who believed in creationism...

People are full of bad takes in shocking hypocrisy. This is definitely just the more public long lasting version of all those.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 132 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Honestly why do people even engage with this hack.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 10 months ago (1 children)

To attempt to wake up those people who think Elon is actually God's gift of mankind.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago

A wake up call on those people will have to go straight for their gut, instead of trying to throw facts at their faces. Even then, it's a hard task

[–] [email protected] 132 points 10 months ago (7 children)

These types of people really need to stop being a part of the problem by getting off Twitter.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)

which one.... Elon? (i'm all for it)

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

It's too far gone for Elon leaving to save it. Although it would still be nice if he did.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 99 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Elon is such a fucking tool

[–] [email protected] 96 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I strongly disagree with that statement... tools are useful.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

He's a piece of modern art

[–] [email protected] 12 points 10 months ago

modern fart

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 81 points 10 months ago (7 children)

I think that he should have avoided the interaction with musk, if he planned to convince Musk of something.

If he planned to educate the general public, his approach is totally fine, though.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago

He did it for a two-fer. He educated the general public ...and handed eloin his ass.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love how muskrat had to put "science" in quotes.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 65 points 10 months ago

I’m just imagining Musk banning his account once he realizes how much he just embarrassed himself.

Followed by:

Lawyer: What brings you in today, Mr. LeCun?
LeCun: I got banned from Twitter.
Lawyer: But I’m a patent attorney.
LeCun: I know.

Beastie Boys “Sabotage” riff starts playing.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 59 points 10 months ago (20 children)

Why do people give that douche the time of day?

[–] [email protected] 89 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Because he owns a bunch of shit. That’s literally it. Nobody would give a single shit about him if he didn’t have money. I saw it put very eloquently like this:

Elon Musk is so poor that all he has is money.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

his Twitter feed is full of things that would make you turn your head and act as it you don't hear anything if it came from a random person on the subway. the only difference between this guy and the "crazy people" you see outside is that this guy has money he doesn't deserve.

edit: i don't know why i said Twitter feed. this includes everything he says in interviews as well

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 10 months ago (17 children)

Does 80 technical papers in 2.5 years seem kind of off to anyone else? That's more than a paper every 2 weeks. Is there really time for meaningful research if you're publishing that often? Is he advising a lot of students? If that's the case, is he providing the attention generally needed for each one? Is his field just super different than mine?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 10 months ago (1 children)

In acamedia you usually get your name on most papers where you help a bit. And if you're the boss, you get your name on papers without even helping but perhaps supplying space, material, budget.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

I've been in academia. My field required a "significant intellectual contribution" to the research and the writing, so no putting your name on papers if you just supplied space/material/budget. You can get an acknowledgement for that, not an authorship credit.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (4 children)

And which reviewer or publishers verifies how "significant" a contribution is beyond seeing some initials matched with tags like "visualization" or "experimental design"? That's right, nobody. It's not even remotely traceable who did what if you're a reviewer.

Academia is full of fraud and people trying to secure their share of credit because in academia it's all about names, as the twitter exchange above illustrates so profoundly. And the other driver for the sad state of academia is of course having the quantity of published papers as the most important criterion for academic success. The more papers, the more citations, the bigger your name will become. It determines your chances of getting funding and therefore your career. If you want to make a career in science you have little options but to comply with this system.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 41 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Yes, thought the same but have a quick look at this: https://scholar.google.com/citations?hl=en&user=WLN3QrAAAAAJ&view_op=list_works&sortby=pubdate Seems about right? But yeah, must be advising lots of students or something. He is rarely the first, second or even third author on the papers.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

There are some people in this world who are smarter and more motivated than we are.

And then there are people who get a head start when their rich daddy gives 'em a bunch of money and they get lucky with how they invest that money but pretend to be a genius anyway.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What an asshole.

And I'm not talking about the scientist.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

college grade troll (who tragically has billions)

[–] [email protected] 31 points 10 months ago

Bro Elon got absolutely ratio’d there when the scientist shared their papers. Like less people saw it and double the amount of likes.

That is very surprising honestly.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What does you’re going soft, try harder even mean in this case? I think that’s a troll, right? Right? I mean, even one solid theory from a paper can change the course of an industry. How do people think things work? I feel dizzy reading this whole exchange

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Anyone not knowing who LeCun has no idea about anything deep learning related.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I'll teach that evil billionaire a lesson by creating content on his platform! Boy, I sure showed him!

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Unfortunately, without anyone of note calling him out on that platform, it turns into pure echo chamber cult activity. There are so, so many people that are like lemmings, that will just follow that flow without doing any personal reflection or critical thinking. It's healthy to have voices of dissent, even if it's indirectly helping/enabling someone that's cultivating mindlessness among the masses. Hell, just look at how his idiotic response has over 2 million "likes". Granted, I'm sure 70-80% of those are fake, but that's still a frightening number of people who support someone like him.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Why are we still sharing snapshots from twitter?

Let's start capturing more interesting conversations that are happening on Lemmy and other places!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

Try harder!

It's okay, Elon, we all know you try the hardest.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 10 months ago

Bu-but daddy Elon invented self driving cars!!!!1!!

load more comments
view more: next ›