An interesting alternative that I've found (for when making English breakfast or something similar) is to steep the teabag in the milk first before adding the hot water. I find that it cuts down on the bitterness and makes a much smoother tea.
Kalcifer
CMV: Trypophobia should be tagged as NSFW.
[…] i don’t appreciate how you deleted then reposted to spam my notifs.
What? I haven't deleted, nor reposted anything in this context. Are you sure you aren't just getting a ping because I @mentioned you in the comment's references ^[1]^?
References
- Type: Comment (Through: Website. Name: "sh.itjust.works".). Author: "Kalcifer" ("@[email protected]"). Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@[email protected]". Publisher: ["Political Memes" ([email protected]). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.]. Published: 2025-03-06T01:56:28Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T02:26Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.
-
- Highlighted in yellow are the mentions to @[email protected]'s contained within the comment's "References" spoiler.
-
I think OP is editing this comment ^[1]^ in bad faith:
-
Current version ^[1.1]^:
-
Original version ^[1.2]^:
References
- Type: Comment. Author: "@[email protected]". Publisher: [Type: Post. Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@[email protected]". Publisher: ["Political Memes" ("[email protected]"). "Lemmy".]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.]. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095972.
- (Through: Website. Name: "sh.itjust.works".). Published: 2025-03-06T00:02:54Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T02:04Z.
- (Through: App. Name: "Thunder".). Published: 2025-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T00:01:03Z.
Please tag your post as a joke, not real, or similar. If you leave it in its current state ^[2]^, you are knowingly peddling disinformation ^[1]^.
Update (2025-03-06T01:45Z): OP has modified the post's body stating that it's a fake tweet ^[3]^. Imo, the title should preface that it's fake ^[1]^.
References
- Type: Article. Title: "Trump post saying US president should be impeached if Dow drops 1,000 points in 2 days isn't real". Author: "Jordan Liles". Publisher: "Snopes". Published: 2023-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:37Z. URI: https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-post-dow-impeachment/.
- ¶4.
[…] Trump did not post a 2012 tweet saying the Dow Jones Industrial Average dropping 1,000 points in two days should result in a U.S. president's immediate impeachment. […]
- ¶4.
- Type: Post (Through: App (Name: "Thunder".)). Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@[email protected]". Publisher: ["Political Memes" ("[email protected]"). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-03-05. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:42Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.
- Type: Post (Through: Website (Name: "sh.itjust.works")). Title: "I mean we’ve done it twice let’s get it started already". Author: "@[email protected]". Publisher: ["Political Memes" ("[email protected]"). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-03-05T23:50:32Z. Accessed: 2025-03-06T01:54Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/33860262/17095410.
[…] I'm not sure […] voting on each defederation is necessary. […]
My proposal does not include voting on cases of defederation.
[…] I am not sure engaging the admins in a philosophical debate about why they blocked an instance is going to be productive. […]
To be clear, I didn't specify that the admins would be required to engage with and resolve every comment that they receive on the posts about the instances that they are defederating from; they simply have that option. The main aspiration of the proposal is that the admins simply provide their rationale for defederating an instance when they do so. I wasn't advocating for some involved process where they must receive agreement and input from the community before a defederation occurs (though, I don't necessarily think that is entirely a bad idea).
[…] it’s potentially the hundreds of options that would need sorting through from the users. […]
I'm not sure that I understand; could you clarify what you mean?
An update for anyone finding this in the future: This proposal has been implemented! ^[1]^
References
- Type: Post. Title: "The 2025 SJW Update: Donations, costs and other points". Author: "TheDude" (@[email protected]). Publisher: ["sh.itjust.works Main Community" ([email protected]). sh.itjust.works. Lemmy.]. Published: 2025-01-29T19:02:48Z. Accessed: 2025-03-03T04:16Z. URI: https://sh.itjust.works/post/31922118.
- §"New Tesseract front end available".
Avocado tree?