KurtVonnegut

joined 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 days ago (3 children)

People with power have the power to hold on to that power, while people without power lack the power to take that power away. Power powers power.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 days ago

That is also very true.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 days ago (1 children)

"Other key members advocated a strategy of decentralization for the far right to create enduring activist institutions."

[–] [email protected] 10 points 5 days ago (2 children)

I do think that most of the left wing people that ever lived are dead.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

If stupidity has a symmetric distribution.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

Make America Genocidal Again

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Thank you. Monero looks interesting.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Oh yes, I can see how that looks bad.

I was referring to the article I shared. How Zionists and Zionism-supporters in the West prevent grassroots money from flowing to Gaza (while our big money has no trouble finding its way to the Israeli genocide machine).

But I guess people generally only read the title.

Or are Zionists themselves maybe.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Does anyone have any idea why this is being downvoted? I'm not hurt or anything, just curious.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you send some person/ organization cash, and they send you crypto coins back? That's the idea?

 

Reading this article reminds me how much our ability to send each other money relies on the willingness of the institutional middlemen who control our money.

Although I believe there are good reasons to control the flow of Big Money, I can't help but feel that it is especially Big Money that manages to escape all institutional control, while it is small money - e.g. the money supporting bottom up resistance and solidarity networks - that is facing all the suppression.

Given all of this, what are the most promising ways for bottom-up networks to share resources in an anonymous, sovereign way? Without e.g. the interference of Zionist, fascist, bootlicking intermediaries?

Is it sending envelopes with cash? Or is this maybe a reason to (cautiously) get into crypto? If the latter, what would be the way to go?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Conservation is not conservatism.

 

You cannot be active on all fronts. You have to pick your buttholes.

42
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

I'm reading here:

As Starlink’s user base grows, the Iranian government is likely to intensify efforts to restrict satellite internet access.

How could they do so?

40
submitted 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

Hi all. For several years I have been together with my partner, who is from a different country and speaks a different language. Together we mostly speak English, but her family does not.

We quite regularly go on holiday with her family, and this is what my question is about: about (how to change) the social dynamics of such holidays.

The point is: together her family has a lot to talk about, even if it is about nothing. They have their internal jokes. They are all very much "tuned into" each other.

As a result, they find it very hard to have attention, time or space for me. Don't get me wrong, I don't have to be in the center of the attention. And yes, I guess this discomfort is partly the result of the privilege of being accustomed to more open, social dynamics that are more inclusive (with my own friends and family). But after several days without talking and without being talked to, it gets quite tough.

In "normal situations" I consider myself quite social and open. But in these situations, after some unsuccessful attempts to "join a conversation", I usually just withdraw in a book, or in my computer.

My partner is aware of this and sometimes tries to get them to involve me, but it's very hard for them to create and maintain space for me.

I can imagine all kinds of reasons: as a family they have withstood hardship that created strong bonds. Also they don't see each other that often. And finally they are used to me not speaking their language (in the beginning), which means that they are used to leaving me outside their conversations.

The point is: I believe they are nice people, and that they are not actively trying to exclude me. I believe (hope) that there are ways to change things around, without undermining the thing that they have going on among each other.

So this is where the question part starts: how to do this?

I was thinking of maybe proposing to play a game in the evening, in which everyone gets a turn to do or say something, which would then also involve me. Does anyone have any suggestions for this?

Or maybe you have other suggestions?

 

This pest is kind of beautiful but also terrible. What is it? Any tips for how to get rid of it, besides cleaning all the leaves?

 

Why do some cultures prefer to light their homes with bright white neon lights? And others with more yellow dimmed lighting?

 

Given that annual fluctuations in solar irradiation become less pronounced the closer you get to the equator, it might get less relevant to track time by referring to our position to the sun?

220
submitted 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
 

This is not a science meme.

I just want to take a moment to thank @[email protected] for providing us with so much quality content.

Really improves my day!

 

Reading this article, and especially the end ...

CEO Jay Graber told The Verge that the plan is to hand over control of the AT protocol to a web standards body like the Internet Engineering Task Force.

... it almost sounds as if Bluesky is (going to be) as community-run as Mastodon.

But I'm suspicious. What is the catch?

view more: next ›