McArthur

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ignoring the foss issue discord just needs slightly better fuzzy search and it would be amazing. Right now I'm usually able to find related discussion but it takes a few different keywords and I know that there's probably something im missing out on because a single character is different...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I was never really aware I did this until I had to program something with hot reloading (I don't remember what) and it was so insufferable...

And now my pain is with rustfmt. Just because I saved before filling in the struct fields does not mean I want you to format the struct accordingly!!!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

I mean if you asked a human to draw a copyrighted image you would also get the copyrighted image. If the human had seen that copyrighted image enough times they might even have memorised The smallest details and give you a really good or near perfect copy.

I agree with your point but this example does not prove it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And what's the reason that seal liver is so high?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Maybe I'm optimistic but I think your comparison to big media companies paying their artist's peanuts highlights to me that the best outcome is to let ai go wild and just... Provide some form of government support (I don't care what form, that's another discussion). Because in the end the more stuff we can train ai on freely the faster we automate away labour.

I think another good comparison is reparations. If you could come to me with some plan that perfectly pays out the correct amount of money to every person on earth that was impacted by slavery and other racist policies to make up what they missed out on, ids probably be fine with it. But that is such a complex (impossible, id say) task that it can't be done, and so I end up being against reparations and instead just say "give everyone money, it might overcompensate some, but better that than under compensating others". Why bother figuring out such a complex, costly and bureaucratic way to repay artists when we could just give everyone robust social services paid for by taxing ai products an amount equal to however much money they have removed from the work force with automation.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It feels to be like every other post on lemmy is taking about how copyright is bad and should be changed, or piracy is caused by fragmentation and difficulty accessing information (streaming sites). Then whenever this topic comes up everyone completely flips. But in my mind all this would do is fragment the ai market much like streaming services (suddenly you have 10 different models with different licenses), and make it harder for non mega corps without infinite money to fund their own llms (of good quality).

Like seriously, can't we just stay consistent and keep saying copyright bad even in this case? It's not really an ai problem that jobs are effected, just a capitalism problem. Throw in some good social safety nets and tax these big ai companies and we wouldn't even have to worry about the artist's well-being.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If It's not better in every way why would I swap? I'll just keep using steam. The only selling point you could use to get me to swap is the promise of feature parity with steam and open source. I would support that even if it hurt a lot along the way, but I doubt it will happen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

I'd be happy to support any kind of platform aiming to do these things even if it doesn't have them yet, so long as it was open source or had some kind of structure that prevented enshitification. I'd contribute, probably force myself to use it where possible much like I do with other things. The issue is that the current competition trying to do what steam does (epic) is just trying to do it but worse.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

As soon as it has linux support for more than wow... people praise valve for proton lots but workshop has also done so much for Linux nmodding which is otherwise a nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Apologies for the confusion when I said to stop preventing steam becoming public. I was just too lazy to write something along the lines of defining some kind of perpetual way to prevent the downfall of steam. Ideally it becomes an open source utopia tomorrow... but that's not exactly realistic for a game store or as a business decision by valve and without people beying able to fork it we are never safe.

[–] [email protected] 103 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (35 children)

Competition sounds great, so long as it has all of the following:

  • Something better than steam input and the steam controller.
  • Something better than steam vr.
  • Something better than steam workshop.
  • something better than proton
  • Something better than steams friends/chat/activity interface.
  • Something better than the steam overlay.
  • Something better than big picture.
  • Absolutely no exclusives, and no deals forcing developers to use it.
  • A nicer store interface than valve, with better community pages, curator pages, discussion pages, etc.
  • An equivalent to steam fest with a strong demo scene.
  • Something better than remote play together

This is of course also ignoring just how efficient, clean, customisable and ergonomic the steam interface is compared to all competition

Oh wait! That doesn't exist. All we need is some way to guarantee valve doesn't become public.

view more: next ›