PaintedSnail

You speak to them of how they aren't an island. You speak to them of how even a recession-proof job is still subject to the rising costs felt by everyone. You speak to them of how these rising costs have over time reduced the actual value of what they've been paid, even with regular cost of living increases. You speak to them of how they have to work harder now for the same results. You speak to them of how much less stress having a good safety net provides, since a recession is not the only way one can fall on hard times. You speak to them of how a small decrease in take-home pay results in a much larger decrease in living expenses, resulting in a net gain.

You speak to them of how they need not be the sacrificial lamb, that they deserve to travel and learn and have a good life as well; and that their family should not have to give that up either to protect their health and well being.

You speak to them of how helping everyone is good for everyone, including themselves. The goal is to raise the standard of living across the board.

That does come with the unavoidable side effect that the majority of the people will simply not participate. It then follows that sites like Reddit will continue to be the place where the majority of the people will go.

If your goal is to participate in small communities and you are okay with the slow pace of those communities, then that's fine. If your goal is to move people away from corporate-sponsored media for whatever reason, then this won't work.

Well, how does it feel to wnt?

And can be properly gutted and de-veined.

I believe the intent is to use appdata for user-specific configs and programdata for system-wide configs.

Tastes and priorities change, and sometimes that means a hobby you enjoyed for a long time may no longer be fun. It's okay to let go of a hobby you no longer enjoy. It's a good chance to try some new things and maybe find a new hobby.

My response would be that if you cannot explain your position, then you cannot defend it, and therefore you do not understand it yourself. This implies that you are simply feeling you way into your position using gut instincts, which are easily created and manipulated without a reasonably sound argument. An ad on TV, a op-ed piece only half heard, a slew of biased headlines, and more all contribute to these gut feelings without providing a rational base.

In short, I reject your claim that complicated positions cannot be explained. Yes, many can't be easily explained, but you should still be able to explain and defend them.

So when the position is challenged and you can't defend it because you have only these gut feelings at the core, you fall back on the belief that anyone would have the same feelings eventually. This is, of course, not true.

I hate that phrase so much.

It sole purpose is to belittle and dismiss the person you are talking to.

It tells the person that they are obviously unable to understand because of some unrelated trait. It's an ad-hominim that just shuts down the conversation.

It's only used by people that cannot actually defend their position, but rather than continue to discuss it, they would rather just shut out the other person.

It's them telling the other person "you are less than me which is why you are wrong, and you must simply accept that because you cannot possibly understand how I am right."

Not standing up to worse makes it more difficult to move away from less bad because now you have to deal with worse before to can get back to dealing with less bad.

Slippery soap all over the floor would complicate matters.