Paradoxvoid

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

America really is an amazing country. I've never even heard of about half of this tier list.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Again, revenue. They report revenue because it's a nice big number, but it's different to profit (which is why a lot of people suspect they don't make much actual money, if any).

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Revenue, sure - I don't believe Google shares profit numbers for Youtube separately to the rest of the portfolio. I could be misinformed though.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Like legit, some of these comments are utterly deranged. YouTube has ZERO competition in the mass market consumer space, everyone else is a niche player, and it's debatable whether YouTube even turns a profit despite that.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

I prefer Shitter.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

Yeah I do understand the reasoning and honestly can't fault them for it - they are a for-profit company after all.

Doesn't mean that it's not a good example of them throwing their weight around (which is admittedly rare).

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (8 children)

Ironically this is actually an example of Valve using its dominant marketshare to suppress rivals - Steam's ToS require devs to have equivalent pricing across all storefronts if they want to sell on Steam at all, so making it harder for cheaper storefront cuts to translate to lower prices to consumers, who might otherwise move to a different storefront.

Devs aren't going to drop Steam as a store, so they're stuck.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago

That may be so, but that's not the way that the initial tweet is using the term, and not the commonly understood definition.

I'm not denying that Valve as a whole have been a force for good in the PC gaming market, but it's pointless to argue semantics and make up definitions to better suit personal bias instead of debating the actual point that's being made.

[–] [email protected] 155 points 2 years ago (29 children)

People saying Steam doesn't have a monopoly because other stores exist, is the same as saying Microsoft doesn't have a monopoly on PC Gaming because Mac and Linux exist. Technically true, but ultimately meaningless because its their market power that determines a monopoly, not whether there are other niche players.

While Valve and Steam have generally been a good player, and currently do offer the best product, they still wield an ungodly amount of influence over the PC gaming market space.

Epic is chasing that because they really want what Valve has, though no doubt they plan to speedrun the enshittification process as soon as they think it safe.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago

Can confirm that the first doesn't work on Alexandrite, but the second works as expected.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I think you're right and it's frontend-specific - I'm using Alexandrite and it shows perfectly, but I just checked the default Lemmy UI and it doesn't handle it properly either.

view more: ‹ prev next ›