I think the populace would move on with the next news cycle lol.
David Grusch seems to believe 2024 could be interesting.
That's my hope as well.
This could be a potentially big deal in regards to investigating Grusch's claims and transparency as a whole. I'm hoping they are able to elect a speaker that is pro UAP transparency.
I found it interesting that around the 43:40 mark, Danny Sheehan talked about how he met privately with Reps. AOC and Jamie Raskin after Grusch's HOC testimony. They are now in the process of getting the "who, what, where" details from him.
Definitely an interesting turn of events and I agree with you on that last part.
Mellon's statement that he believes the Schumer bill will pass and that we'll eventually learn much more about what the government knows and possesses related to UAP gives me some hope.
It appears to me that the DoD believes they are above the law. I fear they actually might be.
“Shit’s real, yo.”
If that's the exact statement, then I'm fully convinced that we are living in a simulation lol.
I guess we'll see what culminates from everything, but it does feel that things are boiling to the surface, albeit slowly.
It's interesting that David Grusch expects the government to make a formal statement regarding UAP in 2024, and that year could be potentially wild in a good way.
I'm curious as to what type of statement he expects to be made.
I find it interesting that he didn't mention this to Representative Burchett.
2024 looking to be an interesting year, especially if these alleged whistleblowers come forward.