I'm sorry for offering up the wrong kind of advice, but I would really urge you to reconsider keto. Its horrible for you. I've lost a lot of weight successfully and many things have worked but keto isn't safe.
I'm not saying its life threatening or you won't achieve your health goals. But keto is just plain bad.
I'm sure a hundred blogs and podcasts that do it exist.
6'1 bordering on 6'2. Happy with it
In that case. Subbed
Well alright fair enough
Any particular reason this is being made while another exists? Not saying there's anything wrong with it, just curious if there's a reason
At Bayern? Bit late to do it isn't it.
Its part of the western tradition. Bonnie and Clyde for example.
PS. I'm not american.
Seventy tooth
I read possessed and was quite confused
Equating all socialism with the authoritarian regimes of the 20th century oversimplifies a complex political tradition.
Dictatorial tendencies are not intrinsic to socialism but are contingent on specific historical and political contexts.
Russia: The Bolsheviks' turn to authoritarianism was partly due to the civil war, external invasions, and a lack of democratic traditions. These circumstances led to the consolidation of power to preserve the revolution, not as an inevitable feature of socialist theory.
In other contexts, socialist movements (e.g., in Scandinavia) have successfully implemented social democratic policies without authoritarianism.
The role of individual leaders and political choices in shaping socialist experiments. Figures like Lenin and Stalin made decisions that prioritized centralized control, which deviated from the principles of worker self-management and democratic participation.
These deviations were not a necessary outcome of socialism but reflected the particular decisions and dynamics of those historical moments. So a small sample size of major socialist states and people cloud judgement.
External hostility often pushed socialist regimes toward authoritarian measures. For example, the USSR faced significant opposition from capitalist countries, which influenced its militarization and political centralization. This external pressure created a siege mentality that undermined the potential for democratic governance.
Democratic socialism has thrived in various countries, showing that socialism can coexist with democratic principles. Examples include the welfare states of Scandinavia, where socialism has enhanced equality and social welfare without undermining political freedoms.
Yes and since op didn't specify any medical condition I didn't think it was a wise idea. Idk why my comment is quite so controversial.