SoulWager

joined 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Looks like the glue failed and so heat was building up instead of transferring.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

In general, not interfering is the default position, there needs to be a reason it should enjoy protection.

Need to look at the goals the legislators were pursuing when they wrote the law. If protecting typefaces hinders the production of new books, that goes against the intent of the law. It might not make a difference on that front NOW, but back when typesetting was done by hand, and you needed a whole set of physical type for each typeface, it was a bigger deal.

The point of copyright is to encourage creativity, and there are reasons you might not care about encouraging creativity in typefaces. It's a bit like trying to copyright how you pronounce a word, getting TOO creative here makes it more difficult to convey meaning, and people will do it anyway without the protection of copyright, it's just a natural consequence of how language develops.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

Typefaces cannot be protected by copyright in the US, but by some stupid interpretation, fonts are software, which is protected. Really annoying how tech-illiterate judges can screw up something this obvious. Even if the technical implementation of a font was something that should be protected IP, it should be under patent law, not copyright.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago (1 children)

As someone that has one, I'd say more than 80%. That might be accurate if you only print other peoples' designs, but for functional parts I've designed, 80% are a total non-issue, 10% need to be rotated 45 degrees on the build plate, 5% need minor redesign to fit, and the rest I was able to break into multiple prints without issue.

Even if you eventually need a bigger printer, I'd still buy this one. I've definitely run into situations where I need to print multiples more often than I've wanted to print something big.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

But then you're buying the phone from google, which is not great if you're trying to boycott google.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

I don't think it has much practicality, just get some known straight/square object and attach your test indicator to the toolhead. Measure your motion error directly.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 months ago

Open source is a major boon for process automation in a print farm. I also wouldn't trust ANY cloud platform with anything remotely sensitive, like product development prototypes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Looks like that arm would be a floppy noodle, it wouldn't surprise me if it needs re-calibrating halfway through a print just from temperature changes.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago

Also called soda ash.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

None of my devices have one that's lacking a physical switch to disable it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

I voted, and my vote definitely did not matter. Nor will it until we completely overhaul the election system, getting rid of the electoral college and first past the post. I don't think that's going to happen either until politicians acquire enough fear to offset their greed.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Could have gone the self-hosted route, but he might just think it's a lost cause as long as you're carrying phone that spies on you.

view more: next ›